Objective: In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can achieve significant clinical responses. This raises the question of whether to consider salvage surgery as a curative treatment option. Few case series reported encouraging results in terms of pathological response. However, intraoperative risk and postoperative morbidity have been highlighted. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of surgery after ICIs administration and to evaluate its effectiveness on the final pathological examination.
Methods: We retrospectively identified stages III-IVA NSCLC consecutive patients who underwent surgery with radical intent after ICIs at three National Centers (2016-2022). Before treatment, all patients were considered unresectable by a multidisciplinary discussion. After surgery, pathological response was evaluated according to the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) recommendation.
Results: Thirty-one patients were included; pretreatment clinical stage was: IIIA in 4 patients (10%), IIIB in 13 (42%), IIIC in 3 (13%), and IVA in 11 (35%). Median treatment duration was four cycles. Only anatomical resections were performed, with lobectomy that represent the main type of resection (22 patients, 74%). A minimally invasive approach was performed in 10 patients (32%), with a conversion rate of 0%. Postoperative complications were observed in eight patients (25%). Complete pathologic response (CPR) and major pathologic response (MPR) were 48% and 16%, respectively. Two and 3-years survival were 88%.
Conclusions: Based on our experience, salvage surgery of advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs confirm his feasibility and safety in responder patients. Moreover, it is associated with low morbidity, high CPR rate, and satisfying medium-term survival.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jso.27920 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Importance: The goal of surgical deescalation is to minimize tissue damage, enhance patient outcomes, and reduce the adverse effects often associated with extensive or traditional surgical procedures. This shift toward less invasive techniques has the potential to revolutionize surgical practices, profoundly impacting the methods and training of future surgeons.
Objective: To evaluate adoption of surgical deescalation within the field of gynecologic oncology using The National Cancer Database.
Ann Surg Oncol
January 2025
Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Neurosurgery
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Neurosurgery
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Diagnostics (Basel)
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Postoperative imaging of musculoskeletal tumors poses a significant diagnostic challenge for radiologists. The complexity arises from the need to differentiate between expected postoperative changes, potential complications, and local recurrence. The choice of imaging modality depends on the type of primary tumor.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!