AI Article Synopsis

  • This study is a retrospective cohort analysis that examines how inadequate correction of lumbar lordosis at L4-S1 during TLIF affects the development of adjacent segment disease and the need for revision surgeries.
  • It included 168 patients, primarily around 61 years old, who underwent 1-3 level TLIF, and the findings indicated that inadequate lordosis restoration led to significantly higher rates of adjacent segment disease (33.3% vs. 6.7%) and revision surgeries (25.9% vs. 5.7%).
  • The results highlight the importance of achieving proper alignment to reduce complications and improve patient outcomes after spinal fusion surgery.

Article Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: Assess the impact of inadequate correction of L4-S1 lordosis during transforaminal lumber interbody fusion (TLIF) on adjacent segment disease and revision rates.

Background: Restoring alignment is an important consideration in spinal fusions. Failure to correct to level-specific alignment goals could promote the development of adjacent segment disease. As such, it is crucial to investigate the role of sagittal segmental alignment on clinical outcomes following short segment lumbar fusion.

Methods: Patients who underwent 1- to 3-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and had two-year outcomes data were included in this retrospective cohort study. Segmental lumbar lordosis was assessed in all patients with L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 constructs. Demographics, radiographic spinopelvic alignment, and complications were compared in a sub-group of patients fused at L4-S1 with adequate (i.e., within 35-45°) and inadequate (i.e., <35°) L4-S1 lordosis.

Results: Among the 168 included patients, mean age was 61.7 years, 56.0% were female, and mean follow-up was 32.3 months. Segmental lumbar lordosis did not change significantly after TLIF of L3-L4, L4-L5, or L5-S1 (P>0.05). Two-year postoperatively, 32.7% developed adjacent segment disease and 19.6% underwent revisions. After stratification by adequate (N=15) or inadequate (N=54) restoration of L4-S1 lordosis following initial TLIF surgery, adequately-restored patients had higher preoperative L4-S1 lordosis (Adequately-Restored=39.3° vs Inadequately-Restored=29.5°, P<0.001) and lower two-year postoperative adjacent segment disease (6.7% vs. 33.3%, P=0.032) and revision (5.7% vs. 25.9%, P=0.l33) rates. Adjacent segment disease patients had higher implant-related complications (Adjacent Segment Disease=36.8% vs No Adjacent Segment Disease=8.0%, P=0.008) and subsequent revisions (61.1% vs. 8.7%, P<0.001).

Conclusions: Adjacent segment disease and revisions after degenerative lumbar spinal fusion are common. In this cohort, suboptimal restoration of L4-S1 lordosis was associated with higher rates of adjacent segment disease and subsequent revisions, thus highlighting the importance of restoring sagittal alignment in degenerative spine surgery.

Level Of Evidence: III.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005161DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adjacent segment
16
segment disease
16
l4-s1 lordosis
12
disease revision
8
retrospective cohort
8
interbody fusion
8
fusion tlif
8
lordosis
5
segment
5
impact segmental
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!