Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03861-3 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Ocular Injuries and Intimate Partner Violence: A Review of the Literature.
Clin Ophthalmol
January 2025
Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Purpose Of Review: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a leading cause of death and disability across the world. We sought to investigate the prevalence and clinical presentation of ocular injuries in IPV.
Recent Findings: Literature review revealed 16 published studies that evaluated ocular injuries in IPV, of which the study types included 9 retrospective studies, 2 prospective, 1 review, 1 invited commentary, 2 case reports, and 1 population-based cross-sectional survey.
Implications of the fair processes for financing UHC report for development assistance: reflections and an application of the decision-making principles to PEPFAR.
Health Econ Policy Law
January 2025
Health Systems Program, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
The framework presented in the World Bank report Open and Inclusive: Fair processes for Financing Universal Health Coverage effectively connects proposed decision-making principles with practical examples that country governments can use to pursue greater fairness. In this commentary, we consider the suggestion that international development partners might use the report's criteria to examine their own processes. We consider what the report's primary Fair Process principles - equality, impartiality and consistency - imply for development partners.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInvited commentary: "Predicting disease-specific survival in patients undergoing active surveillance for papillary thyroid carcinoma".
World J Surg
January 2025
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Sinagpore, Singapore, Singapore.
Invited Commentary: Why use methods that require proportional hazards?
Am J Epidemiol
January 2025
Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
We recently questioned the utility of testing for proportional hazards in survival analysis. Here we expand on why the proportional hazards assumption is both implausible and unnecessary in most medical studies, particularly in randomized trials. We conclude that using survival analysis methods that do not rely on proportional hazards is typically the preferred course of action.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRE: "Invited Commentary: Influence of Incomplete Death Information on Cumulative Risk Estimates in United States Claims Data".
Am J Epidemiol
January 2025
Department of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!