AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focused on comparing the bond strength of traditional White MTA and NeoMTA 2 in immature permanent teeth treated with different disinfection protocols.
  • The methods involved preparing root canals of extracted teeth and dividing them into four groups based on the disinfectants used, with push-out bond strength measured afterward.
  • Results indicated that using HEBP as a disinfectant provided significantly better bond strength compared to EDTA, with both MTA types showing similar performance, suggesting HEBP as a viable alternative to EDTA.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Treatment of an immature permanent tooth required a special disinfection protocol due to the presence of thin radicular walls, which are prone to fracture. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) has been proposed as a root repair material for root canal treatment. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the push-out bond strength of conventional White MTA cements and second generation NeoMTA 2 in imitated immature roots treated with different disinfection protocols, which are 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), followed by 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and NaOCl, followed by 20% etidronic acid (HEBP).

Methods: The root canals of freshly extracted single-root teeth were manually prepared until 90 K-file to imitate immature roots. Roots were randomly divided into four groups (G) according to the disinfection protocol (n = 15 per group). where G1 (NaOCl + EDTA + White MTA) and G2 (NaOCl + EDTA + NeoMTA 2) While G3 (NaOCl + HEBP + White MTA) and G4 (NaOCl + HEBP + NeoMTA 2) All groups were activated with manual agitation. All specimens were incubated for 48 h. The apical third of each root was perpendicularly sectioned to attain a slice of 3 mm thickness. Push-out bond strength values were assessed using a two-way ANOVA and a Student's t test.

Results: G3 and G4 that were treated with HEPB showed higher significant push-out bond strength mean values than G1 and G2 treated with an EDTA chelating agent. Irrespective of the chelating agent used, it was found that both NeoMTA 2 and White MTA had no significant influence on push-out bond strength mean values (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusion: The combined use of 5.25% NaOCl and 20% HEBP increased the push-out strength values of both NeoMTA 2 and White MTA, rendering them suitable to be used as an alternative chelating agent to EDTA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11420242PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-024-00257-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bond strength
20
push-out bond
16
strength values
16
white mta
12
chelating agent
12
disinfection protocols
8
root canal
8
vitro study
8
disinfection protocol
8
immature roots
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!