Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the nonpharmacological safety profile of intravitreal dexamethasone implants in cases with different etiologies.
Methods: This retrospective university-based study analyzed clinical reports of patients receiving 0.7 mg dexamethasone implant injections between 2013 and 2023. The study recorded patient demographics, injection indications, and follow-up data. Complications caused by the injection procedure and adverse events other than pharmacological side effects within a 3-month period were included.
Results: In this study, 3,430 dexamethasone implant injections were made into 1,471 eyes of 1,091 patients. Nonpharmacological complications developed in 611 injections (17.8%). Subconjunctival hemorrhage was noted as the leading nonpharmacological complication (n = 576, 16.8%). Sight-threatening 35 nonpharmacological adverse events and complications (1.0%) were recorded. Cases of anterior chamber migration, vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, hypotony, and implant misplacement were observed. Cases requiring intensive treatments and additional surgical interventions were encountered.
Conclusion: The injection of the dexamethasone implant may lead to nonpharmacological complications caused by the mechanical impact of the injection or improper positioning of the implant, potentially resulting in vision loss. Severe outcomes such as corneal decompensation, retinal detachment, and endophthalmitis can ensue, emphasizing the gravity of these complications. Careful selection of patients and adherence to proper injection techniques are essential in reducing these risks.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004270 | DOI Listing |
Eye (Lond)
January 2025
Department of Ophthalmology, Bursa Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone implantation in the supraciliary (SC) space, a novel and potential effective implantation site, compared to intravitreal (IV) application.
Methods: This prospective study included 39 eyes of 38 patients with macular oedema (ME) who underwent SC and IV dexamethasone implantation (SC-DEX and IV-DEX). Patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups and followed for 3 months.
Cells
December 2024
Institute of Neurosciences, Department of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Neural electrodes used for bidirectional communication between the nervous system and external devices like prosthetic limbs have advanced in neuroprosthetic applications. However, their effectiveness is hindered by the foreign body reaction, a natural immune response causing inflammation and fibrosis around the implanted device. This process involves protein adsorption, immune cell recruitment, cytokine release, and fibroblast activation, leading to a fibrous capsule formation and a decrease in electrode functionality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKorean J Ophthalmol
December 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Diagnostics (Basel)
November 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Policlinico Riuniti Foggia, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy.
Background And Aim: Despite the abundant literature, internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling remains a controversial topic, especially in diabetic eyes. We compared the safety and effectiveness of intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT)-assisted selective epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling with dye-assisted ERM and ILM peeling, for the treatment of tractional diabetic macular edema (tDME).
Material And Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we evaluated consecutive patients with tDME who underwent iOCT-assisted selective ERM peeling (Group A) or "dual blue" dye-assisted ERM and ILM peeling (Group B).
Front Med (Lausanne)
November 2024
Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic, Eye Clinic, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Background/objective: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a common, sight-threatening vascular disorder affecting individuals of all ages, with incidence increasing with age. Due to its complex, multifactorial nature, treating RVO remains a clinical challenge. Currently, treatment strategies include laser photocoagulation (especially for branch RVO), anti-VEGF therapies, and intravitreal corticosteroids.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!