The authors' aim is to build "more biologically plausible learning algorithms" that work in naturalistic environments. Given that, first, human learning and memory are inextricable, and, second, that much human learning is unconscious, can the authors' first research question of how people improve their learning abilities over time be answered without addressing these two issues? I argue that it cannot.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X2400013X | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!