AI Article Synopsis

  • Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a major health issue in southern China, prompting a study to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two treatments: intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG).
  • A microsimulation model assessed long-term outcomes for 5000 hypothetical patients with recurrent NPC, utilizing data from existing literature and databases for analysis from the healthcare perspectives of Mainland China and Hong Kong.
  • Results showed that ENPG significantly reduced risk of disease progression and mortality compared to IMRT, and it was deemed more cost-effective, with a favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in both regions.

Article Abstract

Background: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a significant health concern in southern China, like Guangdong and Hong Kong. This study aims to predict the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two prevalent NPC treatments, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG).

Methods: A microsimulation model was developed to project the long-term outcomes of IMRT and ENPG, simulating 5000 patients with hypothetical locally recurrent NPC for each treatment option. The tumors of patients confined to the nasopharyngeal cavity, the post-naris or nasal septum, the superficial parapharyngeal space, or the base wall of the sphenoid sinus. Analyses were performed from the healthcare system perspectives of Mainland China and the healthcare provider perspective of Hong Kong, with input parameters sourced from the existing literature and databases. The robustness of findings was evaluated through one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Results: For DFS, ENPG showed a 29% reduction in risk with an HR of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64-0.77) compared to IMRT. ENPG demonstrated a significant survival benefit in OS with an HR of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.54-0.65), equating to a 41% reduction in mortality risk. In Hong Kong, IMRT and ENPG yielded QALY gains of 4.59 and 6.29, respectively, with ENPG exhibiting an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICUR) of USD 13 057 per QALY. For Mainland China, ENPG denominated the IMRT and the ICUR was USD -1450 QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a 100% probability of ENPG being cost-effective at the willingness-to-pay thresholds of USD 130 490 per QALY in Hong Kong and USD 12 741 per QALY in Mainland China.

Conclusion: The analysis confirms that ENPG is more effective and cost-effective than IMRT for treating recurrent NPC in both Hong Kong and Mainland China.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hed.27942DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hong kong
20
imrt enpg
12
mainland china
12
effectiveness cost-effectiveness
8
endoscopic nasopharyngectomy
8
intensity-modulated radiotherapy
8
nasopharyngeal carcinoma
8
enpg
8
recurrent npc
8
probabilistic sensitivity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!