A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effects of Far Infrared Radiation and Sitz Bath on Perineal Wound Healing and Pain in Primiparous Women Undergoing an Episiotomy: A Randomized Prospective Parallel Arm Study. | LitMetric

Introduction Episiotomy is a common surgical procedure done during childbirth. The study aims to assess the efficacy of far-infrared (FIR) and sitz bath (SB) effects on pain relief and healing of perineal wounds in primiparous women who had undergone an episiotomy. Materials and methods A randomized prospective parallel arm study was conducted among 208 primigravida women who underwent episiotomy in a tertiary hospital in the southern part of India from December 2020 to March 2022. Participants were randomized into the FIR (n-104) and SB therapy groups (n-104) and their efficacy was assessed for pain relief and healing of perineal wounds using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Redness, Oedema, Ecchymosis, and Discharge, the Approximation Scale (REEDA) and the Modified Oxford Scale (MOS). The variables were compared using an independent two-sample t-test and chi-square test (p ≤ 0.05). Results Pain was evaluated using VAS, and by the sixth week postpartum, 90.4% (94) of the FIR group reported mild to no pain compared to 88.5% (92) of the SB group. Wound integrity assessment using the REEDA scale showed better results among the FIR group (94, 90.4%) than the SB group (93, 89.4%) on the second day postpartum. Perineal muscle tone, measured by the MOS, was slightly better in the FIR group (59, 62.8%) than the SB group (55, 59.8%) at the sixth week postpartum, although these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion FIR therapy reduces postpartum discomfort, promotes wound healing, and improves perineal muscle tone better than SB therapy. FIR also enhanced patient compliance and efficacy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11415939PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.67477DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fir group
12
sitz bath
8
wound healing
8
primiparous women
8
randomized prospective
8
prospective parallel
8
parallel arm
8
arm study
8
pain relief
8
relief healing
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!