AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study focuses on comparing the effectiveness of Ultrasound (US)-guided and Fluoroscopy-guided hydrodilatation treatments for adhesive capsulitis, highlighting that the incidence is higher in diabetic patients.
  • - Results showed that the US-guided group had significantly better outcomes in pain reduction, range of motion (ROM), and improvements in shoulder scores within the first few weeks after treatment compared to the fluoroscopy group.
  • - Long-term follow-up indicated that 70.3% of patients in the US-guided group maintained normal or near-normal ROM, suggesting that US-guided hydrodilatation may be the more effective method for treating this condition.

Article Abstract

Background: The incidence of adhesive capsulitis varies from 2-5% in the general population to 20% in people with diabetes. One of the most effective treatment methods is hydrodilatation, which can be done under US-guidance or Fluoroscopic guidance. However, the clinical effectiveness of US-guided injections in comparison to fluoroscopy-guided injections is still debatable. The possibility of severe side effects, the expense, and the time required to carry out this minimally invasive procedure highlight how crucial it is for patients to have a precise intra-articular injection. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided vs. Fluoroscopic guided hydrodilatation for patients with adhesive capsulitis.

Methods: Sixty-four patients were randomly selected for hydrodilatation using any one of the techniques. The patients were evaluated for clinical improvements using the visual analog scale (VAS), oxford shoulder score (OSS), and range of motion (ROM).

Results: The US-guided group experienced more pain reduction than the fluoroscopy group within the first four weeks (P < 0.001). The increase in ROM was much more significant in the US-guided group for the first 8 weeks. Improvement in Abduction and External rotation was much more significant (P < 0.001) in the first 4 weeks after hydrodilatation in the US-guided group. The improvement in ROM was maintained on long-term follow-up (mean 24 months), with 45 out of 64 (70.3%) reporting a normal or near normal ROM. On assessing the Oxford shoulder score improvements, the US-guided group's score significantly increased after the first week (P = 0.003), but the fluoroscopy-guided group's score increased after the second week. On comparison between the two groups, the amount of score improvement was more significant in the US-guided group than in the fluoroscopy-guided group in the first 4 weeks (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: US-guided technique for intra-articular injection for patients with adhesive capsulitis provided a quicker pain reduction and a larger improvement in range of motion and overall shoulder functions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11411173PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.62347/YHQM4422DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

us-guided group
16
adhesive capsulitis
12
group weeks
12
guided hydrodilatation
8
intra-articular injection
8
patients adhesive
8
oxford shoulder
8
shoulder score
8
range motion
8
pain reduction
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!