A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Anesthetic Risk with Large Mediastinal Masses: A Management Framework Based on a Systematic Review. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Anesthesia in patients with large mediastinal masses poses risks of severe hemodynamic and respiratory issues, necessitating a review of current evidence to understand the associated dangers and interventions.
  • A systematic review of studies was performed, focusing on adults with these masses undergoing procedures, and identified different risk categories (low to very-high) based on symptoms and anatomical compression.
  • The findings provide a framework for anesthetic management, allowing for tailored preparation and contingency plans based on individual patient assessments.

Article Abstract

Background: Anesthesia administered to a patient with a large mediastinal mass engenders concern that it may precipitate catastrophic acute hemodynamic or respiratory decompensation. A review of the available evidence is needed to define the degree of risk, mechanisms, and preventative or reactive interventions to mitigate the risk.

Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed database was conducted of studies involving adults with large mediastinal masses undergoing a procedure or anesthesia; all types of publications were included that provided data regarding risks, mechanisms, or techniques to address potential decompensation. This literature involves primarily case reports and small retrospective series; no quality assessment was deemed appropriate. Evidence was synthesized according to the consensus judgment of the writing panel.

Results: Categories of low-, moderate-, high-, and very-high-risk emerged from review of the 72 included studies, based on the degree of symptoms, mass/chest ratio, and degree of airway and/or vascular compression. This streamlines the preparation needed-minimal for low-risk and more extensive for higher-risk. Assessment of the impact of physiologic derangement stemming from the anatomic compression in individual patients provides a framework for anesthetic management, and back-up plans should decompensation occur.

Conclusions: Despite limitations in the evidence inherent to a topic involving an uncommon but serious event, a framework was developed to streamline preparation for and management of patients with a large mediastinal mass requiring anesthesia in a rational manner.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

large mediastinal
16
mediastinal masses
8
systematic review
8
mediastinal mass
8
anesthetic risk
4
large
4
risk large
4
mediastinal
4
masses management
4
management framework
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!