AI Article Synopsis

  • Inadequate postoperative pain management can hinder patient recovery and create significant health and economic issues, prompting the need for better systems like the Artificial Intelligent Patient-Controlled Analgesia (Ai-PCA) to help anesthesiologists assess patient pain levels effectively.* -
  • This study focused on evaluating the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of anesthesiologists regarding Ai-PCA in Jiangsu Province, China, using a questionnaire distributed to 396 professionals working in tertiary hospitals.* -
  • Results showed that while most participants (78%) had good knowledge and positive attitudes towards Ai-PCA, only 20.5% demonstrated good practical application, with training in Ai-PCA significantly boosting their knowledge and practice

Article Abstract

Background: Inadequate postoperative analgesia greatly affects the recovery of patients, can poses a substantial health and economic burden. Patient-controlled analgesia is the most commonly used method for postoperative pain relief. However, the situation of inadequate analgesia still exists. Artificial intelligent Patient-controlled analgesia (Ai-PCA) system can make it easier for medical staff to understand the pain level of patients in order to deal with it in time. So far, several studies have investigated anesthesiologists' knowledge and management of Ai-PCA.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the degree of anesthesiologists' knowledge, attitude and their practice (KAP) towards Ai-PCA in east China's Jiangsu Province.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 396 anesthesiologists working in tertiary hospitals. The data were collected using a pretested, structured and self-administered KAP questionnaire. The data were analyzed using Independent t-test, analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation and multiple linear regression tests.

Results: Five hundred twelve questionnaires were collected, 396 anesthesiologists (190 Male, and 206 Female) were included in our study for statistical analysis. The score of knowledge, attitude, practice was 5.49 ((SD = 1.65; range:0-8), 37.45 (SD = 4.46; range:9-45), and 26.41 (SD = 9.61; range:9-45), respectively. Among the participants, 309 (78%) and 264 (66.7%) had good knowledge and positive attitudes toward Ai-PCA, respectively. However, only 81 (20.5%) of the participants exhibited good practice regarding Ai-PCA. Participation in Ai-PCA training showed a significant correlation with knowledge, attitude and practice scores. Besides, age, years of experience and professional titles of anesthesiologists were correlated with knowledge scores. The title of the anesthesiologist was associated with attitude scores. And the marital status of anesthesiologists was correlated with practice scores.

Conclusion: Our findings revealed the score of practice regarding Ai-PCA are very poor among anesthesiologists in east China's Jiangsu Province. The utilization of Ai-PCA was found to be impacted by whether the individual had received training. This calls for a comprehensive approach should be conducted for raising the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice of anesthesiologist on using Ai-PCA and more Ai-PCA training to be included in the daily learning.

Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ; 27/10/2023; ChiCTR2300077070).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414209PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02724-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

knowledge attitude
20
attitude practice
20
patient-controlled analgesia
12
east china's
12
china's jiangsu
12
ai-pca
9
knowledge
8
practice
8
artificial intelligent
8
intelligent patient-controlled
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!