A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Low placenta at the mid trimester anomaly scan-A cause for concern? | LitMetric

Low placenta at the mid trimester anomaly scan-A cause for concern?

J Clin Ultrasound

Department of Fetal Medicine, Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, India.

Published: September 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate how effective internal os distance (IOD) measurements during mid-pregnancy scans can predict low-positioned placenta in later pregnancy and establish a cut-off point for identifying this condition.
  • A prospective cohort study followed women with low-positioned placenta (IOD < 20 mm) through to childbirth, analyzing risks based on placental location and cesarean history.
  • Findings indicated that most women (93.42%) with low-positioned placenta at mid-trimester had normal placements by the third trimester, suggesting that specific IOD cut-off points could help with early diagnosis and management.

Article Abstract

Objective: This study was aimed to assess the predictive validity of internal os distance (IOD) in mid-trimester scan for the prediction of third-trimester low-positioned placenta, and to define a cut-off of IOD at which third-trimester low-positioned placenta could be identified, see the association of placental site (anterior/posterior), previous history of cesarean section with abnormal location of placenta in third trimester and see the maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Methods: It was a prospective cohort study of women with low-positioned placenta (IOD < 20 mm) at mid-trimester anomaly scan followed up in third trimester till birth. Relative risks for a low-positioned placenta in the third-trimester were calculated for women with posterior versus anterior, low-lying placenta versus placenta previa and positive versus negative history of cesarean section. Multilevel likelihood ratios and corresponding ROC curves for different ranges of IOD were calculated.

Results: Women with posterior placenta had a high risk of low positioned placenta compared to anterior placenta (9.28% vs. 0.74%); RR 1.45, similarly women with placenta previa had high risk compared to low lying placenta (68.57% vs. 1.69%); RR 6.51, so did the women with previous cesarean section (9.41% vs. 5.87%); RR 1.47.

Conclusions: 93.42% placenta which were low positioned in mid trimester were normally situated in third trimester. The cut-off for IOD in anterior placenta was -40 mm and in posterior placenta was 14.3 mm. IOD measurement and interpretation seems promising.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23841DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

low-positioned placenta
12
third-trimester low-positioned
8
low placenta
4
placenta mid
4
mid trimester
4
trimester anomaly
4
anomaly scan-a
4
scan-a concern?
4
concern? objective
4
objective study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!