A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Documentation of shared decision-making in diagnostic testing for dementia in Dutch general practice: A retrospective study in electronic patient records. | LitMetric

Documentation of shared decision-making in diagnostic testing for dementia in Dutch general practice: A retrospective study in electronic patient records.

Patient Educ Couns

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute (MHeNS), Alzheimer Centre Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location VU, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Published: January 2025

Objective: To explore (1) documentation of shared decision-making (SDM) in diagnostic testing for dementia in electronic patient records (EPR) in general practice and (2) study whether documentation of SDM is related to specific patient characteristics.

Methods: In this retrospective observational study, EPRs of 228 patients in three Dutch general practices were explored for the documentation of SDM elements using Elwyn's model (team talk, option talk, decision talk). Patient characteristics (gender, age, comorbidities, chronic polypharmacy, the number of consultations on memory complaints) and decision outcome (wait-and-see, GP diagnostics, referral) were also extracted.

Results: In EPRs of most patients (62.6 %), at least one SDM element was documented. Most often this concerned team talk (61.6 %). Considerably less often option talk (4.3 %) and decision talk (12.8 %) were documented. SDM elements were more frequently documented in patients with lower comorbidity scores and patients with a relatively high number of consultations. Decision talk was more frequently documented in referred patients.

Conclusion: Patients' and significant others' needs, goals, and wishes on diagnostic testing for dementia are often documented in EPRs.

Practice Implications: Limited documentation of option and decision talk stresses the need for future SDM interventions to facilitate timely dementia diagnosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108446DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

decision talk
16
diagnostic testing
12
testing dementia
12
documentation shared
8
shared decision-making
8
dutch general
8
general practice
8
electronic patient
8
patient records
8
documentation sdm
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!