Comparison of urine and serum IgG detection ELISA for tegumentary leishmaniasis diagnosis and prognosis.

Immunobiology

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde: Infectologia e Medicina Tropical, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 30130-100 Minas Gerais, Brazil; Departamento de Patologia Clínica, COLTEC, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901 Minas Gerais, Brazil. Electronic address:

Published: November 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on developing a serum- and urine-based ELISA test for diagnosing tegumentary leishmaniasis (TL) to overcome limitations of current diagnostic tests, like sensitivity and the need for blood collection.
  • It uses various antigens, including a recombinant protein and a synthetic peptide, and evaluates 205 samples from different groups, showing high specificity (around 98%) but low sensitivity (ranging from 24% to 100% depending on the antigen used).
  • The findings indicate that urine could be a viable alternative for diagnosing TL, with significant drops in antibody levels noted after treatment, potentially offering a new prognostic tool.

Article Abstract

Laboratorial diagnosis of tegumentary leishmaniasis (TL) is hampered by variable sensitivity and/or specificity of the tests, which are still hampered by blood́ invasive collection. In this context, in the present study, we develop a serum- and urine-based ELISA to TL diagnoses. A recombinant protein (rLiHyA), which was previously showed to be antigenic for the disease, as well as a B-cell epitope produced as synthetic peptide and a Leishmania antigenic extract (SLA), were used as antigens. A total of paired 205 urine and serum samples were used, which were comprised by samples from cutaneous (n = 30) and mucosal (n = 30) leishmaniasis patients, as well as from healthy individuals living in endemic region of disease (n = 45), of patients with Chagas disease (n = 30), leprosy (n = 35), malaria (n = 15) or HIV-infected (n = 20). Results showed that serum-based ELISA presented sensitivity of 24.0 %, 100 % and 41.0 %, when SLA, rLiHyA and synthetic peptide were used as antigens, and specificity of 98.4 %, 98.4 % and 98.4 %, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and results were 0.74, 1.0, and 0.71, respectively, when SLA, rLiHyA and synthetic peptide were used as antigens. Performing an urine-based ELISA, sensitivity was 28.0 %, 100 % and 75.0 %, respectively, when SLA, rLiHyA, and synthetic peptide were used, while specificity values were of 98.4 %, 98.4 % and 98.4 %, respectively. In addition, the AUC values were 0.82, 1.0, and 0.94, respectively. A significant drop in specific antibodies levels in both patientś serum and urine samples was found six months after treatment, suggesting a prognostic role of rLiHyA for TL. In conclusion, preliminary data suggest the potential of use patient urine to TL diagnoses.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imbio.2024.152853DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

synthetic peptide
16
984 % 984 %
16
sla rlihya
12
rlihya synthetic
12
urine serum
8
tegumentary leishmaniasis
8
urine-based elisa
8
peptide antigens
8
984 %
6
rlihya
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!