AI Article Synopsis

  • In Goma, many people rely on medicine retailers instead of regular healthcare because it’s cheap, fast, and easy to get medicine.
  • The study involved groups of people discussing their reasons for this choice, which helped researchers understand their views and practices.
  • Even though people know there are risks using medicine retailers, they find ways to protect themselves by checking the sellers' knowledge and asking for caring advice.

Article Abstract

Background: Medicine retailers, considered here as any person or setting dedicated to the sale of retail medicines, fill an important gap in terms of access to healthcare in areas where population are not covered by universal healthcare schemes. In Goma in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, such retailers have proliferated and are consulted as the first port of call by more than half of the population, playing therefore a key role as an alternative source of healthcare for any type of health condition. The objective of this study is to understand people of Goma's rationale for using the medicine retailers over the formal healthcare system.

Methods: Twelve focus groups, gathering 147 participants in total, were conducted in four worship communities, covering the most common faiths practised in Goma. Three focus group discussions were organised per worship community: one with fathers, another with mothers, and another with chronic patients and/or highly vulnerable people. We used a qualitative and inductive approach to analyse the participants' practices and perceptions in terms of their use of medicine retailers. We identified central categories explaining the reasons for using medicine retailers and the choice of a specific medicine retailer.

Results: When facing a health problem, most of the participants in our study tended to first buy medicines at medicine retailers because it was cheap, quick, and easily accessible. Most were aware of the risks and limitations of such practices and had developed a number of mitigation strategies in order to reduce those risks: evaluating medicine retailers' expertise; developing a "medical expertise"; and seeking proactively out empathetic care.

Conclusions: People in Goma make a conscious and rational choice when resorting to medicine retailers as it is seen as the least-worst option in a complex situation. In order to reduce the risks, they have developed a number of mitigation strategies. Future research should focus on the organisation of medicine retailers as a professional group to improve their supervision in a sensitive context such as Goma and on modalities to articulate them to the formal health system to guarantee a financial accessibility to healthcare for all.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412008PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02596-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medicine retailers
32
medicine
10
people goma
8
retailers
8
developed number
8
number mitigation
8
mitigation strategies
8
order reduce
8
reduce risks
8
healthcare
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!