Background: Randomized studies have endorsed nonabsorbable prosthetics for contaminated ventral hernia surgery, yet the broader applicability and impact on patient-reported outcomes are still questioned. Here, we evaluated the long-term outcomes of elective contaminated ventral hernia repairs (based on Centers of Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] wound classification) using real-world data from a multicenter US cohort, focusing on quality of life and postoperative pain.
Methods: The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database was queried for patients undergoing elective contaminated (CDC class II-IV) ventral hernia repair (2013-2023). After propensity matching, we compared long-term differences in patient-reported quality of life and pain scores (by HerQLes and PROMIS questionnaires) among those who underwent repair with nonabsorbable, absorbable synthetic, and biologic mesh.
Results: A total of 1,073 patients were included, of whom 920 (86%), 56 (5%), and 97 (9%) underwent repair with nonabsorbable, absorbable synthetic, and biologic mesh, respectively. Among them, the median age was 62 years (interquartile range [IQR] 53-70), and 523 (49%) were male. The median length and width of the defect were 20 cm (IQR 12-25) and 13 cm (IQR 8-16), respectively. A transversus abdominis release was performed in 716 patients (67% of all cases). In most cases, the mesh was positioned in the retro-rectus (85%) and/or the preperitoneal space (45%). Before and after propensity matching (n = 185), the change from baseline in HerQLes and PROMIS scores at 6 months and at 1, 3, 5, and 6 years was comparable between different types of mesh. Lastly, there were no differences in readmission, surgical site infection, or surgical site occurrence at 30 days. Recurrence at 1 year was also comparable among groups.
Conclusion: In the long term, there were no differences in quality of life or pain scores with nonabsorbable, absorbable synthetic, or biologic mesh for elective ventral hernia repair in contaminated fields.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.08.017 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Assessment of the European Hernia Society Classification of Ventral Hernias and Clinical Outcomes.
HCA Healthc J Med
December 2024
HCA Houston Healthcare Kingwood, Kingwood, TX.
Background: Ventral hernias are a common but heterogeneous disease. Communication among key stakeholders (eg, patients, clinicians, administrators, payers, and researchers) can be augmented by a widely utilized classification system. The European Hernia Society (EHS) developed an expert-opinion-based hernia classification system organized by hernia type (primary versus incisional) and size.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnterior component separation techniques: is it necessary to preserve the perforators? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hernia
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, NY, USA.
Background: Anterior component separation (ACS), or Ramirez component separation technique, is an established technique still used by surgeons to repair a ventral hernia. Compared with other ventral hernia repair techniques, recent studies about ACS show more postoperative complications like wound breakdown, wound infection, hematoma, skin necrosis, seroma, and recurrence. Our study aims to compare the ACS technique with the preservation perforator technique and verify if the perforator preservation technique can decrease postoperative complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOnlay Resorbable Biosynthetic versus Underlay Biologic Mesh Ventral Hernia Repair in Contaminated Fields.
J Surg Res
January 2025
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Introduction: Abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) with ventral hernia repair (VHR) in the setting of contamination poses unique and controversial challenges. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of onlay resorbable biosynthetic mesh against underlay biologic mesh in contaminated VHR with AWR.
Methods: A single-center retrospective review from 2015 to 2021 was performed examining subjects who underwent VHR with AWR in contaminated fields (Centers for Disease Control wound class II-IV).
Spigelian hernia and cryptorchidism syndrome: open spigelian hernia repair and laparoscopic one-stage orchiopexy for ectopic testis.
BMJ Case Rep
January 2025
Pediatric Surgical Services, Mary Bridge Children's Hospital and Health Center, Tacoma, Washington, USA
Spigelian hernia and cryptorchidism syndrome in children is increasingly reported in the literature. A variety of phenotypes have been reported, so diagnostic approaches and operative techniques remain poorly defined. The case of an infant male who presented with a left spigelian hernia and ipsilateral cryptorchidism who was initially misdiagnosed with an ectopic inguinal testis is presented.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReconstruction of Abdominal Defects After Open Abdomen Treatment Using Propeller Flaps of the Superior and Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery System: Report of Two Cases.
Microsurgery
January 2025
Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Open abdomen treatment (OAT) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In cases where primary or delayed fascial closure cannot be achieved, vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction are indicated, which often result in a planned ventral hernia. If secondary skin closure is not feasible, common treatment of granulated abdominal defects involves split-thickness skin-grafting or healing by secondary intention leading to significant scarring and sometimes mutilating defects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!