Background: Ustekinumab is an interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23 inhibitor for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Objective: This real-world study compared ustekinumab and tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFis) in Chinese moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients.

Methods: Patient health records of 110 moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients initiating or switching biologics were reviewed, with 31 patients receiving ustekinumab (ustekinumab group) and 79 patients receiving TNFis (TNFi group).

Results: Compared with TNFi group, psoriasis area and severity index (PASI)-75 response rate at month 6 (M6) were elevated (87.1% versus 65.8%,  = 0.026) in the ustekinumab group, whereas the rates at month 1 (M1) and month 3 (M3) and PASI-90 response rates at M1, M3, and M6 only showed an increasing trend (all  > 0.050) in the ustekinumab group than the TNFi group. By subgroup analyses, ustekinumab (versus TNFi) was more effective in patients with biologics therapy history than those without. Compared with the TNFi group, the ustekinumab group had lower dermatology life quality index scores and higher patient satisfaction scores at M3 and M6 (all  < 0.050).

Conclusion: Chinese moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients treated with ustekinumab have a better treatment response at 6 months with improved quality of life and patient satisfaction after 3-6 months of treatment when compared to TNFi.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2405554DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ustekinumab group
16
moderate-to-severe psoriasis
12
tnfi group
12
ustekinumab
9
patient satisfaction
8
tumor necrosis
8
necrosis factor-alpha
8
factor-alpha inhibitors
8
real-world study
8
patients receiving
8

Similar Publications

Leishmaniasis in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A National Multicenter Study of GETECCU.

United European Gastroenterol J

January 2025

Gastroenterology Department, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Hospital General Universitario Dr Balmis de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL), Madrid, Spain.

Background: Leishmaniasis (LI) is a vector-borne illness caused by a protozoan of the genus Leishmania. Data on the features of LI in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are scarce.

Aim: To describe the characteristics of patients with IBD who present with leishmaniasis, infection outcomes and the risk factors associated with developing visceral leishmaniasis (VL).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: In ulcerative colitis (UC), anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents often are first-line biologic therapy. Switching to a biologic with a different mode of action (ustekinumab and vedolizumab) or cycling to another anti-TNF agent (adalimumab, infliximab, and golimumab) is necessary if an initial anti-TNF fails. This study compared real-world persistence in patients with UC who switched to a biologic with a different mode of action or cycled with another anti-TNF after nonresponse to an anti-TNF.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Superior persistence of ustekinumab compared to anti-TNF in vedolizumab-experienced inflammatory bowel diseases patients: a real-world cohort study.

BMC Gastroenterol

December 2024

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Branch, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5, Fu-Hsin Street, Guei-Shan District, Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan.

Background/aims: The increasing use of biologic therapies for moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) highlights the importance of optimal treatment sequencing, particularly after vedolizumab (VDZ) exposure. Studies comparing the effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) and antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents post-VDZ are limited.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed VDZ-experienced IBD patients treated with UST or anti-TNF (adalimumab and infliximab) from May 2019 to January 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Early biologic intervention after diagnosis has shown improved clinical and endoscopic outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), while very little is known about the effectiveness of early versus late administration of Ustekinumab (UST).

Objectives: We aimed to compare early versus late UST use in managing CD and identify potential predictors associated with clinical and endoscopic outcomes.

Design: This was a retrospective observational study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of clinical decision support tool (CDST)-guided initial selective intensive induction therapy (IIT) for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who were treated with ustekinumab (UST) and to identify those most likely to benefit from IIT.

Methods: Patients with active CD were included in this multicenter retrospective study and were categorized as low-, intermediate-, and high-probability responders according to the UST-CDST. IIT was defined as intensive induction by two or three initial doses of weight-based intravenous UST administration.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!