Value of PASI90 Versus Merit-Based Incentive Payment System Efficacy Measures.

J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN USA.

Published: July 2022

Background: Achieving ≥90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90) is achievable with newer biologic therapies, such as ixekizumab. Standard of care payment systems such as the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) responder criteria could lead to under treatment and lower quality of life (QoL) outcomes compared with PASI90.

Objective: Show PASI90 is a higher standard than MIPS and is associated with greater improvements in QoL and other PRO outcomes.

Methods: Patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis meeting PASI90 and MIPS criteria were compared in 3 phase 3 clinical trials of the interleukin-17A inhibitor ixekizumab (pooled UNCOVER-2/3 and IXORA-S). Patients satisfying MIPS criteria met either static Physician Global Assessment score ≤2, body surface area <3%, PASI <3, or Dermatology Life Quality Index ≤5. Improvements in QoL were compared between patients meeting PASI90 and MIPS criteria.

Results: All PASI90 responders were also MIPS responders (PASI90 responders). Not all MIPS responders met PASI90 (MIPS-only responders). Significantly larger change from baseline improvements for all health (skin pain, Itch NRS, DLQI, PtGA, WPAI-PsO work productivity loss, and WPAI-PsO activity impairment) and quality of life (EQ-5D 5L VAS and acute SF-36 PCS/MCS) outcome measures were observed in the PASI90 responders vs the MIPS-only responders.

Conclusion: PASI90 is a higher standard of response than MIPS and is associated with greater improvements in health and quality of life outcome measures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11361529PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24755303221082623DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

merit-based incentive
8
incentive payment
8
payment system
8
mips criteria
8
pasi90
4
pasi90 versus
4
versus merit-based
4
system efficacy
4
efficacy measures
4
measures background
4

Similar Publications

Background: Depression screening is an important first step to identifying patients who might benefit from depression treatment. Merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS) quality measures can yield financial benefits or losses for healthcare systems, including depression screening.

Objectives: This study aims to (1) develop a team-based care workflow to improve MIPS depression screening in a specialty clinic and (2) modify the workflow to include a virtual nursing and behavioral health resource after the COVID-19 pandemic hit.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Quality measures increasingly influence the delivery and reimbursement of care provided in emergency departments. While emergency physicians are accustomed to using quality measures to improve care delivery, payors, including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), are increasingly adjusting reimbursement to measure performance as a means to bend the cost curve and improve the value of healthcare services. The American College of Emergency Physicians Quality and Patient Safety Committee presents this whitepaper to guide practicing emergency physicians through the policy context of implementing measures in emergency care and understanding its impact reimbursement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Relative value units (RVUs) were first introduced by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989 to standardize physician compensation based on the effort, skill, and resources required for medical services. This methodology replaced the "usual, customary, and reasonable" standard, which reduced variability in payments across providers. RVUs are comprised of physician work, practice expenses, and malpractice costs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Objective: Value-based payment programs link payments to the performance of providers on cost and quality of care to incentivize high-value care. To improve quality and lower costs, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented the Quality Payment Program (QPP) for clinicians in 2017. Under the Medicare QPP, most eligible clinicians participate in one of the payment models: (a) Advanced Alternative Payment Models (A-APMs) through eligible APMs like Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) or (b) the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study explores the implementation of the Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) 4Ms Framework into primary care clinics in rural Arkansas, facilitated by the AGEC and funded by The Health Resources and Services Administration's Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Program (GWEP) grant. Implementation success is evaluated by monitoring merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS) measures and other variables, providing insight into the effectiveness of integrating AFHS and enhancing older adult care. AGEC employed implementation strategies (train-the-trainer, audit and feedback, and clinical reminders using Electronic Medical Record (EMR)), the i-PARIHS implementation framework, and the RE-AIM evaluation framework to facilitate integration of the AFHS 4Ms Framework into partnered rural federally qualified healthcare clinics (FQHC).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!