AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to determine if high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy is at least as effective as noninvasive ventilation (NIV/BiPAP) for treating bronchiolitis-related respiratory failure in children under 2 years old.
  • - Conducted in a Brazilian hospital, the trial involved 126 children in each treatment group, with assessments of their health and treatment outcomes, including the need for intubation and length of hospital stay.
  • - Results showed a lower intubation rate in the HFNC group (23%) compared to the NIV group (29%), and while the difference was not statistically significant, HFNC therapy resulted in lower sedation needs and hospital stays, indicating it could be a

Article Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to compare HFNC therapy to noninvasive ventilation (NIV/BiPAP) in children with bronchiolitis who developed respiratory failure. We hypothesized that HFNC therapy would not be inferior to NIV.

Methods: This was a noninferiority open-label randomized single-center clinical trial conducted at a tertiary Brazilian hospital. Children under 2 years of age with no chronic conditions admitted for bronchiolitis that progressed to mild to moderate respiratory distress (Wood-Downes-Férres score < 8) were randomized to either the HFNC group or NIV (BiPAP) group through sealed envelopes. Vital signs, FiO, Wood-Downes-Férres score and HFNC/NIV parameters were recorded up to 96 h after therapy initiation. Children who developed respiratory failure despite receiving initial therapy were intubated. Crossover was not allowed. The primary outcome analyzed was invasive mechanical ventilation requirement. The secondary outcomes were sedation usage, invasive mechanical ventilation duration, the PICU LOS, the hospital LOS, and mortality rate.

Results: A total of 126 patients were allocated to the NIV group (132 randomized and 6 excluded), and 126 were allocated to the HFNC group (136 randomized and 10 excluded). The median age was 2.5 (1-6) months in the NIV group and 3 (2-7) months in the HFNC group (p = 0,07). RSV was the most common virus isolated in both groups (72% vs. 71.4%, NIV and HFNC, respectively). Thirty-seven patients were intubated in the NIV group and 29 were intubated in the HFNC group (29% vs. 23%, p = 0.25). According to the Farrington-Manning test, with a noninferiority margin of 15%, the difference was 6.3% in favor of HFNC therapy (95% confidence interval: -4.5 to 17.1%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the PICU LOS or sedation duration. Sedation requirement, hospital LOS and invasive mechanical ventilation duration were lower in the HFNC group.

Conclusion: HFNC therapy is noninferior to NIV in infants admitted with mild to moderate respiratory distress caused by bronchiolitis that progresses to respiratory failure.

Trial Registration Numbers: U1111-1262-1740; RBR-104z966s. Registered 03/01/2023 (retrospectively registered). ReBEC: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-104z966s .

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412039PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-05058-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hfnc therapy
12
therapy noninvasive
8
noninvasive ventilation
8
respiratory failure
8
"comparison high-flow
4
high-flow nasal
4
nasal cannula
4
cannula hfnc
4
ventilation niv
4
niv children
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!