Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction/objectives: This study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value and net benefits, including cost-effectiveness, of a point-of-care analyser (i-STAT®) for measurement of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) in dogs and cats.
Animals, Materials And Methods: Hundred and twenty dogs and 120 cats presented with signs of cardiac disease and suspected myocardial insult on cardiac assessment. This was a validation study expressed as agreement between the i-STAT® analyser and two common commercial reference methods (IMMULITE® 2000 and ACCESS® hsTnI).
Results: The comparison between methods showed a negative bias between the i-STAT® and the two commercial cTnI assays. The bias was more evident when the i-STAT® values were compared to the traditional cTnI assay (IMMULITE® 2000), with a calculated difference of -1.14 ng/mL (dogs) and -0.96 ng/mL (cats). However, the bias was distinctly lower when the i-STAT® measurements were compared to the high-sensitivity cTnI assay (ACCESS®), namely -0.3 ng/mL in dogs and -0.17 in cats.
Discussion: The i-STAT® method can reliably detect normal, low and elevated cTnI values, which is fundamental to differentiate pets with and without myocardial damage and, with the rapid availability of results, this confirms the clinical utility of the i-STAT® method.
Conclusions: cardiac troponin I concentrations measured with the i-STAT® have good comparability with those obtained with both commercial assays for low and elevated cTnI values. However, results should be cautiously interpreted for high cTnI values, especially if a strict cut-off value is adopted for diagnostic or prognostic purposes in critical clinical conditions, such as myocarditis or acute myocardial ischaemia.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvc.2024.07.006 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!