Background: Opioid abuse and mortality are ravaging American society, highlighting the need to find alternative effective analgesics with fewer side effects. FDA-approved topical analgesics, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), are commonly used to treat musculoskeletal pain but can cause adverse effects. Natural compounds, including essential oils, are potential therapeutic alternatives for managing musculoskeletal pain. If these compounds can provide comparable analgesia to FDA-approved products, it will increase the available options for people with pain, improving quality of life with minimal morbidity and mortality.

Objective: This study assesses the effectiveness and onset of action of Bonipar, a topical analgesic formulated with camphor, methyl salicylate, and oils of coconut, eucalyptus, nutmeg, and rosemary, in managing musculoskeletal pain compared to 1.5 % diclofenac solution, an FDA-approved topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

Methods: One hundred sixty-four adult patients with localized musculoskeletal pain were randomly assigned to twice-daily applications of either Bonipar or Diclofenac for one week. The primary outcome measure was a 50 % reduction in pain after one week. Secondary outcomes included the change in pain from baseline and onset of action, defined as the first reduction in pain by 20 %.

Results: All patients completed the initial pain assessment to determine the onset of action. One-week data was available for 74 patients treated with diclofenac and 72 patients treated with Bonipar. Data for 18 patients were incomplete. The proportion of patients achieving a 50 % reduction in pain was statistically similar between the two groups. The success rates of achieving a 50 % pain reduction with Bonipar were found to be non-inferior to those treated with diclofenac. All follow-up time points showed roughly similar results between the groups. Regression models adjusted for age and sex revealed no significant effects on pain changes. Secondary analyses demonstrated no significant differences between the groups.

Discussion: The topical analgesic Bonipar demonstrates a comparable onset of action, with efficacy non-inferior to diclofenac in the management of musculoskeletal pain, while showing fewer adverse effects compared to diclofenac. These findings highlight the potential of Bonipar as a valuable alternative for the treatment of localized pain.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101908DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

musculoskeletal pain
24
onset action
16
pain
15
topical analgesic
12
reduction pain
12
bonipar topical
8
fda-approved topical
8
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory
8
adverse effects
8
managing musculoskeletal
8

Similar Publications

Background: Central sensitisation (CS) increases musculoskeletal pain. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) or self-report questionnaires might indicate CS. Indices of CS might be suppressed by exercise, although the optimal exercise regimen remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction Excessive repetitive physical activity most often leads to acute musculoskeletal pain. The management of acute pain is one of the primary concerns. The nociceptive pain has both sensory and affective qualities, patterns, and intensity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This research explores the types and effectiveness of occlusal splints in managing temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). TMDs encompass a range of musculoskeletal and neuromuscular conditions affecting the jaw, causing pain, limited movement, and discomfort. Occlusal splints, also known as bite guards, are commonly used in dentistry to alleviate TMD symptoms by relaxing jaw muscles, preventing joint trauma, and protecting teeth.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The debate addressing the classification of chronic widespread pain as a physical disorder (fibromyalgia syndrome) [FMS] or a somatoform disorder according to psychiatric classification systems has continued for decades.

Objectives: The review aims to line out the new perspectives introduced by the 11th version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD 11) of the World Health Organization (WHO).

Methods: Critical review of the classification criteria of fibromyalgia syndrome and bodily distress disorder in ICD 11.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!