AI Article Synopsis

  • Municipalities struggle with environmental goals due to limited resources, which often leads to the emergence of grassroots environmental organizations that help fill gaps in governance.
  • Watershed groups are essential for effective governance, yet they face challenges like inadequate resources and leadership, hindering their ability to make a meaningful impact.
  • Research conducted in the Hudson River watershed highlights that strengthening internal capacity—like leadership and strategic planning—can enhance the sustainability and effectiveness of these groups, leading to better long-term outcomes for environmental protection.

Article Abstract

Municipalities face challenges meeting environmental protection and conservation goals due to a lack of resources, capacity, and political will. As a result, grassroots environmental organizations often emerge to help meet these challenges by filling gaps in governmental operation and structure. At the watershed scale, environmental organizations and groups are critical for effective watershed governance, often helping with collaboration as well as providing municipalities with additional support and resources. Despite the vital role environmental organizations and groups can play, they continue to face challenges such as insufficient resources, inconsistent leadership, and lack of organizational structure, thus limiting the contributions they can deliver. In this manuscript, we present case study research on watershed groups exploring their capacity to meet their mission and goals. Drawing from a needs assessment study conducted in the Hudson River watershed in 2019-2021, we found that while watershed groups are generally in need of technical resources, participation, and funding, our research suggests capacity (such as internal structure, strategic planning, and leadership) is most important for successful and sustainable groups. Therefore, we argue that support for capacity is more likely to help sustain groups and their long-term beneficial impact. To make this argument we present qualitative interview and focus group data to articulate watershed group goals, challenges, and needs, with an emphasis on capacity-related themes that emerged around expertise, leadership, structure, and planning. We then conclude with recommendations that can be applied to other watershed groups in the United States, and likely beyond.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02045-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

watershed groups
16
environmental organizations
12
groups
8
hudson river
8
watershed
8
river watershed
8
face challenges
8
organizations groups
8
capacity-building watershed
4
groups lessons
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!