Aim: The purpose of this study was to examine the lived experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other (LGBTQ+) people with disabilities when interacting with healthcare professionals related to their gender identity, sexuality, and disability.

Subject And Methods: Historically marginalized groups face many inequities in health care. However, little is known about the intersectional experiences of LGBTQ+ people with disabilities when receiving health care given their likelihood to encounter multiple marginalizations. Data were collected via the 2019 National Survey on Health and Disability (NSHD) and included a sample of 197 LGBTQ+ respondents with disabilities living in the U.S. Quantitative data and demographics were analyzed using descriptive methods. Qualitative data were analyzed using deductive and inductive methods.

Results: 72.2% of LGBTQ+ respondents with disabilities avoided discussing their gender or sexual identity with their healthcare providers, with 9.8% never disclosing their identity. Qualitative analyses revealed themes centered around experiences of negative interactions with healthcare providers, including fear, distrust, and avoidance of care (40.1%), dismissal or denial of treatment (30.5%), and assault or aggressive activity (4.1%), although some reported no problems or need to discuss their LGBTQ+ or disability identities (14.7%).

Conclusion: LGBTQ+ people with disabilities reported high rates of negative experiences disclosing gender or sexual identity and/or disability with healthcare providers. Further research is needed to determine whether negative interactions with medical providers may be caused by a lack of medical understanding, false assumptions about the de-sexualization of disabled people, or ignorance about LGBTQ+ identities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11404532PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-02145-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lgbtq+ people
12
people disabilities
12
healthcare providers
12
health care
8
lgbtq+ respondents
8
respondents disabilities
8
gender sexual
8
sexual identity
8
negative interactions
8
lgbtq+
7

Similar Publications

Background: Despite increased access to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Canada, familiarity and experience among primary care providers (PCPs)-including family doctors and those working with key populations-remains limited. To understand the barriers and facilitators of PrEP familiarity and experience, we conducted a situational analysis in PCPs in sub-urban and rural Ontario.

Methods: We surveyed a non-probabilistic sample of PCPs using an online questionnaire, designed with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[Trust during medical consultations with trans* people].

Rev Med Suisse

January 2025

iEH2 - Institut éthique histoire humanités, CMU, Université de Genève, 1211 Genève 4.

Trust is a particularly important element in a healthcare relationship, but it is often misunderstood. In this article, we explore the trust relationship between patients and healthcare professionals and the expectations underpinning it. We then look at some of the expectations of trans* people in the context of medical consultations that are not related to medical transition.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ensuring culturally competent nursing care for LGBT+ people.

Nurs Stand

January 2025

Department of Mental Health and Social Work, Middlesex University, London, England.

People who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and other sexual and gender minorities (LGBT+) can encounter various challenges when seeking healthcare. For example, many LGBT+ individuals experience discrimination and social stigma from healthcare professionals, leading to feelings of mistrust. This might manifest as explicit homophobia or transphobia, inappropriate questioning, or a lack of consideration for the sensitivities around LGBT+ identities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Improvements to eating disorder (ED) care are urgently needed in the United Kingdom (UK) and around the world. Informed by my lived experiences, independent research, and involvement in the underappreciated field of quality improvement (QI), I have written this article to offer ideas on how to improve individuals' access to and experiences of ED care. As I live in the UK, my lived and QI experiences are of the UK's National Health Service (NHS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Most of those surveyed said they were satisfied with such care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!