A comparative assessment of uncrushed-river concrete mix of Hari-River, and Kamar-Kalaq: the two widely used concrete mix in Herat, Afghanistan.

Concrete, as a cornerstone of modern construction, heavily relies on the quality of its constituent materials, particularly aggregates. Among the critical factors contributing to high-quality concrete are proper gradation, absence of clay particles, and angular shape of aggregates. Adhering to these standards typically results in concrete with superior strength. However, aggregates sourced from riverbeds often possess a natural gradation, contain clay particles, and have rounded shapes. This study delves into a comparative analysis of aggregates sourced from two widely utilized riverbed regions, namely Hari-River and Kamar-Kalaq, situated within Herat province, Afghanistan. Given that over 90% of concrete in Herat province is sourced from these two riverbeds, the findings of this study carry immense significance. The research meticulously examines key parameters, including clay content, gradation, aggregate shape, and compressive strength, to determine the optimal choice for concrete production. Methodologically, samples were acquired following ASTM standards, and rigorous testing procedures were conducted, encompassing clay particle analysis, sieve analysis, and strength testing. The results reveal significant disparities between the two regions, with Hari-River demonstrating superior characteristics across various metrics. Particularly noteworthy is Hari-River's lower clay content of 2.7% compared to Kamar-Kalaq's 3.7%. The gradation of Hari-River for both coarse and fine aggregates is superior to that of Kamar-Kalaq when compared to size 67 aggregate range. Additionally, the average 28 days concrete compressive strength of Hari-River aggregates is 27.8 MPa, while that of Kamar-Kalaq is 23.4 MPa.