Study Design: Retrospective study.
Objectives: The objectives were to determine whether vertebral bone quality (VBQ) scores are associated with interbody cage subsidence following transforaminal (TLIF) and posterior (PLIF) lumbar interbody fusions and whether there is a clinically sensitive threshold for subsidence.
Background: Interbody cage subsidence following lumbar fusion is a complication that can generate poor surgical outcomes. Prior research has correlated cage subsidence with bone mineral density. VBQ scores derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been proposed as a tool for measuring bone mineral density, offering a potential new and convenient preoperative risk assessment tool for subsidence.
Methods: The study involved patients undergoing single-level PLIF or TLIF between 2007 and 2022. Exclusions were for nondegenerative diagnoses, multilevel/revision surgeries, inadequate radiographs, missing immediate postoperative radiographs, and preoperative MRI studies older than 1 year. VBQ was calculated at L1-L4 from preoperative T1-weighted MRI images. Subsidence was assessed by changes in disc height (DH; >2 mm difference) and segmental lordosis (SL; >5 degrees difference) between immediate weight-bearing postoperative and latest postoperative lateral radiographs. Statistical analysis included descriptive and inferential statistics.
Results: Subsidence was observed in 27% (SL parameter) and 47% (DH parameter) of 51 total patients. VBQ scores were significantly associated with cage subsidence based on both SL (odds ratio = 7.750, P = 0.012; correlation coefficient = 0.382, P = 0.006) and DH (odds ratio = 4.074, P = 0.026; correlation coefficient = 0.258, P = 0.057) in the combined TLIF/PLIF cohorts. In the cohort of 36 patients undergoing TLIF, a VBQ of 2.70 yielded 100.0% sensitivity and 46.2% specificity in detecting subsidence with SL measurement (area under the curve = 0.812, P < 0.001) and 86.7% sensitivity and 47.6% specificity with the DH measurement (area under the curve = 0.692, P = 0.033).
Conclusions: We found that MRI-based VBQ scores are effective predictors of cage subsidence following TLIF surgery. A VBQ score of 2.70 demonstrated a reliable model and high sensitivity for doing so, identifying a potential clinical threshold for preoperative subsidence risk assessment.
Level Of Evidence: Level III.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001682 | DOI Listing |
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an China.
Study Design/setting: A retrospective cohort study.
Objective: To compare long-term outcomes and complications of cervical disc replacement (CDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with cage-plate constructs (CPC) and stand-alone (SA) cages in treating degenerative cervical spondylosis.
Summary Of Background Data: ACDF is commonly used for cervical radiculopathy but may increase adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).
Front Surg
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Cangzhou, Hebei, China.
Objective: To investigate the risk factors of low back pain after oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in patients with low grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS).
Methods: This retrospective study included 116 patients with single-level low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with low back pain who underwent OLIF surgery in our hospital from December 2017 to October 2020. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and radiological characteristics of this population were analyzed to determine the relationship between these characteristics and the degree of low back pain relief after OLIF.
J Clin Neurosci
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, NY, USA. Electronic address:
Background: Although cage subsidence is one of the most common phenomenona associated with interbody fusions and was characterized more than 70 years ago, a standardized method for its measurement, detection, and reporting among different lumbar fusion procedures does not exist. Here, we review previously published literature on cage subsidence to present the most common methods for defining subsidence in the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) techniques.
Methods: A search was completed in PubMed and Embase with inclusion criteria focused on identifying any study that provided descriptions of the method, imaging modality, and subsidence threshold used to define the presence of cage subsidence in study articles published between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2022.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, The Ohio State University, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Introduction: Lumbar degenerative spinal disease is a common, major cause of pain and disability. Titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are popular materials for interbody implants although evidence is mixed on which material is superior in terms of fusion and subsidence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of 3D printed titanium (3DPT) cages in patients undergoing TLIFs, as well as complication profiles based on widely used outcome metrics and reoperation events.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Orthop Surg Res
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Section, Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Objective: Combining oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with posterior pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) has been proposed to reduce cage subsidence, especially in osteoporotic spines. Recently, anterolateral screw-rod fixation has gained interest as it allows direct pathology observation and avoids a posterior approach. However, controversies exist between anterolateral screw fixation systems and traditional PPSF due to variations in osteoporotic vertebral mineral density, screw fixation positions, and fixation methods (bicortical vs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!