Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
J Funct Biomater
September 2024
Odontology at Ilapeo College, Curitiba 80710-150, Brazil.
This study aimed to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes, including implant survival, marginal bone loss, and patient satisfaction, in individuals with severe bone atrophy treated using a newly developed system of short and extra-short implants. A total of 44 implants (37 short and 7 extra-short) were placed with immediate loading in 11 patients. The patients were followed up at between 6 and 24 months.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Esthet Restor Dent
October 2024
Dept. of Prosthodontics, Dental School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Objective: The aim of the present study was to investigate the relation of the implant position to the implant crown and analyze the location and magnitude of bite force.
Materials And Methods: The dimensions of 49 posterior implant-supported restorations were recorded in terms of: 1. implant diameter, 2.
Natl J Maxillofac Surg
July 2024
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Context: Short implants are acceptable treatment options for atrophic ridges; however, they increase the crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio compared to regular length implants. The study aimed to assess the correlation between the C/I ratio and marginal bone loss (MBL) in single short implants at the posterior of the mandible.
Aims: The study aimed to assess the correlation between the C/I ratio and MBL in single short implants at the posterior of the mandible.
J Indian Soc Periodontol
June 2024
Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Science, Institute of Medical Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Objective: The objective is to compare and evaluate the hard and soft tissue parameters by using short and standard long implants with sinus lifting in the posterior maxilla.
Materials And Methods: Eleven patients with complaints of missing upper back teeth were enrolled in the study for implant-supported rehabilitation and were categorized into two groups: Group long (GL): longer implant (>8 mm) placement, preceded by Sinus Augmentation. Group short (GS): short implant (≤8 mm) placement, without sinus augmentation.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!