A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Microleakage of Class II Posterior Composite Restorations with and Without use of Liners - A Comparative Study. | LitMetric

Aim: This study aims to compare the effect of liner on microleakage in Class II restorations at the occlusal and gingival levels when restored with a nanocomposite.

Methodology: A total of 60 mandibular molars were selected and divided into three groups. Cavities in Group A were restored with posterior nanocomposite without liner, samples of Group B were restored with posterior nanocomposite with flowable composite liner and in Group C samples were restored with posterior nanocomposite with resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) liner. Samples were stored at 37°C in 100% humidity for 14 days. Samples were subsequently immersed in 0.5% methylene blue dye and then placed under water for 15 mins. Teeth were sectioned mesiodistally with a diamond disc and examined under a stereomicroscope.

Results: All the cavities exhibited dye penetration along the occlusal and gingival margins of the restored cavities. Group A showed maximum leakage compared to Groups B and C, which was statistically significant ( P = 0.001 and P < 0.0001). No significant difference in microleakage was observed between Groups B and C. Microleakage was more in gingival margins as compared to occlusal margins in all the groups.

Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, it may be concluded that the placement of liner beneath nanocomposite restoration results in a significant reduction in microleakage.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_973_23DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

restored posterior
12
posterior nanocomposite
12
microleakage class
8
occlusal gingival
8
cavities group
8
group restored
8
liner samples
8
gingival margins
8
microleakage
5
liner
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!