AI Article Synopsis

  • - The kidney failure risk equation (KFRE) is used to estimate the risk of kidney failure and aids in early referral to kidney services for those at high risk, particularly people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease.
  • - A study involving 7,296 individuals showed that 10.2% developed end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) over a follow-up period of about 10 years, with the KFRE performing well in predicting these events but generally underestimating the risk.
  • - The KFRE demonstrated strong discrimination for ESKD risk, with C-index scores of 0.842 and 0.816 for the primary endpoint at 2 and 5 years, respectively, indicating that its calibration

Article Abstract

Introduction: The four variable kidney failure (KF) risk equation (KFRE) is recommended to estimate KF risk (ie, need for dialysis or kidney transplantation). Earlier referral to clinical kidney services for people with high-risk of kidney failure can ensure appropriate care, education and support are in place pre-emptively. There are limited data on investigating the performance of KFRE in estimating risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The primary ESKD endpoint event was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <10 mL/min/1.73 m and secondary endpoint eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m.

Research Design And Methods: We studied 7296 people (30% women, 41% African-Caribbean, 45% Caucasian) with T2DM and CKD (eGFR median (range) 48 (15-59) mL/min/1.73 m) were included at two hospitals in London (median follow-up 10.2 years). Time to ESKD event was the endpoint and Concordance index (C-index) was used to assess KFRE's discrimination of those experiencing ESKD from those who did not. Mean (integrated calibration index (ICI)) and 90th percentile (E90) of the difference between observed and predicted risks were used as calibration metrics.

Results: Of the cohort 746 (10.2%) reached ESKD primary event (135 (1.9%) and 339 (4.5%) over 2 and 5 years, respectively). Similarly, 1130 (15.5%) reached the secondary endpoint (270 (3.7%) and 547 (7.5%) over 2 and 5 years, respectively). The C-index for the primary endpoint was 0.842 (95% CI 0.836 to 0.848) and 0.816 (95% CI 0.812 to 0.820) for 2 and 5 years, respectively. KFRE 'under-predicted' ESKD risk overall and by ethnic group. Likewise, the C-index for secondary endpoint was 0.843 (0.839-0.847) and 0.801 (0.798-0.804) for 2 and 5 years, respectively. KFRE performance analysis performed more optimally with the primary endpoint with 50% enhancement of the calibration metrics than with the secondary endpoint. KFRE recalibration improved ICI by 50% and E90 by more than 78%.

Conclusions: Although derived for predicting KF, KFRE also demonstrated good discrimination for ESKD outcome. Further studies are needed to identify variables/biomarkers that may improve KFRE's performance/calibration and to aid the development of other predictive models to enable early identification of people at risk of advanced stages of CKD prior to onset of KF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11404155PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004282DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

kidney disease
12
kidney failure
12
kidney
8
end-stage kidney
8
people type
8
type diabetes
8
failure risk
8
risk equation
8
risk
5
investigation end-stage
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!