A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

How to review a submitted dermatology manuscript. | LitMetric

How to review a submitted dermatology manuscript.

Clin Exp Dermatol

Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Published: September 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The article provides a practical framework for new peer reviewers in Dermatology, addressing the lack of guidance in the field.
  • Step 1 involves a quick read of the manuscript to grasp the study's topic and design.
  • Step 2 includes a detailed review using an EQUATOR checklist, while Step 3 focuses on organizing feedback into major and minor comments that help clarify the study's validity and conclusion.

Article Abstract

Although much has been written about peer review science, practical advice on HOW to peer review articles is lacking, especially for Dermatology. This article aims to provide a practical, stepwise framework to support new reviewers. Step 1 involves a rapid read of the manuscript to get a feel of the topic and to clarify the study question and design. Step 2 is a thorough slower read, using an appropriate EQUATOR checklist. Step 3 is to organise your comments to authors into major and minor points in a constructive way, focusing on clarity of question, internal validity, external validity and whether interpretation fits with the results. Finally, make a recommendation to the editor, indicating whether the study is publishable with suitable revision or whether it contains some fatal flaws. We hope that this practical guide will encourage and help new reviewers to take on this rewarding and important scientific task for patient benefit.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ced/llae371DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peer review
8
review submitted
4
submitted dermatology
4
dermatology manuscript
4
manuscript written
4
written peer
4
review science
4
science practical
4
practical advice
4
advice peer
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!