AI Article Synopsis

  • Comparative sonographic examination of the renal resistance index (RRI) is useful in detecting renal artery stenosis, but the impact of stent graft implantation on RRI is unclear.
  • This study aimed to evaluate how stent graft implantation into healthy renal arteries affects the RRI during treatment for pararenal aortic aneurysms.
  • In a group of 32 patients, RRI values showed no significant change before and after the stent graft implantation, indicating that RRI is reliable for assessing renal perfusion after such procedures.

Article Abstract

Comparative sonographic examination of the renal resistance index (RRI) can provide evidence of renal artery stenosis. The extent to which the RRI is changed after stent graft implantation is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of stent graft implantation into non-diseased renal arteries during endovascular treatment of pararenal aortic aneurysms on the RRI. Sonographic examinations of the kidneys were conducted using a GE ultrasound system. The evaluation was performed according to the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2D standard criteria. RRI values were determined in consecutive patients on the day before and after stent graft implantation and compared for each kidney. A total of 32 consecutive patients (73.9 ± 8.2 years, 5 females, 27 males) were treated with a fenestrated or branched aortic stent graft including bridging stent graft implantations into both renal arteries and received pre- and postinterventional examinations. Sonomorphologically, the examined kidneys were inconspicuous. The arborisation of the renal perfusion was preserved pre- and post-implantation. The RRI did not differ (0.66 ± 0.06 versus 0.67 ± 0.07; = ns). Successful stent graft implantation into non-stenosed renal arteries did not lead to a relevant change in RRI. Therefore, the RRI is a suitable tool for assessing renal perfusion after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic therapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11394166PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14171860DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stent graft
28
graft implantation
20
renal arteries
12
renal
9
bridging stent
8
renal artery
8
endovascular aortic
8
renal resistance
8
consecutive patients
8
fenestrated branched
8

Similar Publications

Stent-graft implantation is a widely recognized method for endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms. In cases where the aneurysm involves the thoracic and abdominal aorta, repair including fenestrated and branched stent grafts provides a viable alternative. This approach, initially reserved for patients unsuitable for open surgery, has become preferred for anatomically appropriate thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Endovascular treatment of postoperative aortic coarctation aneurysms-a single center experience.

Front Cardiovasc Med

December 2024

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital 'St. Ekaterina', Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Background: Formation of local type aortic aneurysm years after surgical repair of coarctation (CoA) occurs in 10% of patients independent of the surgical technique and is a potentially life-threatening condition if left untreated with a high risk of aortic rupture. Redo open surgery is associated with 14% in-hospital mortality and a high risk of complications. Endovascular treatment appears to be a feasible alternative with a high success rate and low morbidity and mortality, but data concerning long-term results is still mandatory.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair (EVAR) offers a less invasive approach to treating abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) compared to open repair. However, EVAR is associated with higher rates of reintervention. This study investigates the early and mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent late open conversion including aneurysmorrhaphy after EVAR at our institution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Since the mid-1900s, techniques in the repair of aortic arch and thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies have drastically evolved. Open aortic surgical repair was once the sole option for both simple and complex aneurysmal degeneration. Today, a number of minimally invasive and hybrid approaches are now available to assist both the surgeon and patient in tackling this challenging problem.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the Zenith Dissection Endovascular System (ZDES) against traditional stent grafts for repairing acute complicated Type B Aortic Dissection (AcTBAD).
  • A retrospective analysis of 32 patients revealed that the ZDES group experienced fewer postoperative adverse events (12 vs. 37), demonstrating better outcomes in false lumen thrombosis at 6 months and lower 3-year mortality rates.
  • Despite some patients needing secondary interventions in the ZDES cohort due to aortic growth, overall results suggest the ZDES may offer improved safety and efficacy compared to traditional methods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!