AI Article Synopsis

  • The interesterification process modifies the structure of triacylglycerols (TAGs) by replacing saturated fatty acids with healthier monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids to create structured lipids (SLs).
  • The study evaluated the fatty acid profile and oxidative stability of various blends of hemp seed oil and coconut oil, finding that while the ratios of saturated to unsaturated fatty acids remained consistent, the blends exhibited higher acid values than standards.
  • Although the oxidation time and overall stability varied based on the oil blend ratio, the results indicated a need for further removal of free fatty acids post-interesterification to enhance the quality and storage stability of the structured lipids made from these oils.

Article Abstract

The interesterification process allows structured lipids (SLs) to be obtained with a modified triacylglycerol (TAG) structure, in which the unfavorable saturated fatty acids (SFAs) are replaced with nutritionally significant fatty acids (FAs) such as monounsaturated (MUFAs) and polyunsaturated (PUFAs). Oxidative stability is crucial for the quality of SLs. This study aimed to characterize and evaluate the FA profile and oxidative stability of SLs synthesized by the enzymatic interesterification of hemp seed oil (HO) and coconut oil (CO) blends. Blends were prepared in three ratios (75% HO:25% CO, 50% HO:50% CO, and 25% HO:75% CO) and interesterified using -1,3 regiospecific lipase for 2 or 6 h. FA composition, the FA distribution of TAGs, acid value (AV), peroxide value (PV), and oxidation time were analyzed and compared to non-interesterified blends. Results showed no significant difference in the SFA:MUFA ratios between interesterified and non-interesterified blends with the same proportions. Lauric acid predominantly occupied the -2 position in all blends. Interesterified blends had higher AVs, exceeding codex standards, while PVs remained within the acceptable limits. Blends with 75% HO had lower oxidation times compared to those with 75% CO, with no significant difference between interesterified and non-interesterified blends. In the interesterification process of the studied blends, new TAGs with a modified structure were created, which may affect their physical and nutritional properties. This process also had a significant effect on the AV and PV levels, but not on the oxidation time of the modified blends. Therefore, it is necessary to remove free FAs after the enzymatic process to produce SLs characterized by improved hydrolytic stability. This will lead to better technological properties compared to the original oils. Further research is also necessary to enhance the oxidation stability of SLs obtained from blends of CO and HO to improve their storage stability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11394877PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods13172722DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

non-interesterified blends
12
blends
11
enzymatic interesterification
8
structured lipids
8
interesterification process
8
fatty acids
8
oxidative stability
8
stability sls
8
oxidation time
8
interesterified non-interesterified
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!