Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Statement Of Problem: Monolithic computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) ceramics have various microstructures, but studies on their optical and surface properties after tooth-brushing are lacking.
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the changes in the color, gloss, surface roughness, and surface topography of different monolithic CAD-CAM ceramics after simulated tooth-brushing and compare the tested parameters of the different ceramics.
Material And Methods: Ninety specimens were prepared with a 1.5-mm thickness from 9 different materials: monolithic zirconia (ZR), lithium disilicate ceramics (precrystallized and crystallized), zirconia reinforced lithium silicate ceramics (precrystallized and crystallized), interpenetrating network ceramic, leucite reinforced ceramic, feldspathic ceramic, and interpenetrating network nanoceramics (n=10). After mechanical polishing, the color parameters, gloss, and surface roughness values of each specimen were measured. Then, the specimens were subjected to 50 000 tooth-brushing cycles. After the brushing simulation, the color change (ΔE) values were calculated, and the gloss and surface roughness values of the specimens were measured. Data were statistically analyzed with 2-way repeated measures of ANOVA and Bonferroni multiple comparison tests (α=.05).
Results: The brushing simulation and ceramic type affected the gloss and surface roughness values of the tested ceramics (P<.001). The surface roughness values of the ceramics increased after 50 000 cycles of simulated brushing. The surface gloss of the ZR group significantly increased after 50 000 cycles of simulated brushing (P<.001). Only the ceramic type affected the color change values (P<.001). The color change value (ΔE) of ZR was the highest among the tested materials, exceeding the perceptibility threshold after 50 000 cycles, while the ΔE of the other materials was lower.
Conclusions: Simulated tooth-brushing affected the surface gloss and surface roughness of the tested materials. The ceramic type affected the surface gloss, surface roughness, and color change values. Except for the monolithic zirconia, the color change values were below the perceptibility threshold (0.8) in the experimental groups.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.010 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!