Exploring the Evolution of Research Connectivity and Funding in Global Neurosurgical Publications.

World Neurosurg

Duke Global Neurosurgery and Neurology, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Duke University Health System Department of Neurosurgery, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Duke Global Health Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address:

Published: December 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study addresses disparities in neurosurgical care globally and examines how collaborations have shifted from traditional mission trips to partnerships, analyzing the impact of research funding on these collaborations using a graph theoretical approach.
  • - A bibliometric search found 307 neurosurgical articles published from 1985 to 2020, revealing that co-authorship rates between high-income and low- or middle-income countries have increased significantly, especially after 2015, with LMIC-LMIC partnerships rising at a faster pace than others.
  • - Research funding plays a crucial role in fostering collaborations, as funding from charitable organizations and government grants was linked to increased co-authorship between LMIC and HIC authors, while most LMIC-LMIC co-authorship

Article Abstract

Background: There are critical disparities in the neurosurgical care provided around the globe due to challenges in resource allocation, training, and infrastructure. Global neurosurgical collaborations have replaced classical mission trips to address these disparities. However, the development of these collaborations and the impact of research funding on their growth have not yet been systematically studied. In this article, we use a graph theoretical approach to investigate trends in funding and co-authorship between and among authors from high-income countries (HICs) and authors from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods: A bibliometric search of the global neurosurgical literature returned 307 articles between 1985 and 2020. A connectivity analysis was conducted to compute the number of co-authorships between HIC-HIC, LMIC-HIC, and LMIC-LMIC authors. The number of connections, summarized as either a global sum of connections or an average number of connections per manuscript, were analyzed in the context of time and funding through parametric statistical tests.

Results: An exponential increase in co-authorship collaboration was observed over time, especially after 2015. Notably, LMIC-LMIC collaborations appear to be rising at over twice the rate of other collaboration types. The presence of funding, in general, was associated with increased co-authorship of manuscripts by LMIC and HIC authors together (P = 0.033). A significant majority of the funding associated with LMIC-HIC co-authorships was supplied through charitable organizations and government grants (P = 0.034, P = 0.009, respectively). Most LMIC-LMIC co-authorships had no funding.

Conclusions: This work shows significant and rapid growth in international neurosurgical partnerships, especially in HIC-LMIC and LMIC-LMIC collaborations. Also, a significant positive relationship exists between research funding and LMIC-HIC co-authorship trends. This work encourages us as a community to continue to expand our translational collaborations with LMIC neurosurgeons and establish funding mechanisms independent of HIC authors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.029DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

global neurosurgical
12
funding
8
number connections
8
lmic-lmic collaborations
8
hic authors
8
neurosurgical
5
collaborations
5
authors
5
exploring evolution
4
evolution connectivity
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!