Combinatorial creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: A definitional update.

Phys Life Rev

Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address:

Published: December 2024

Simonton (2010) presented a combinational model of exceptional creativity based on Campbell's (1960) theory of blind-variation and selective-retention (BVSR). The presentation provided an explanatory and predictive basis for comprehending the phenomenon with respect to individual, domain, and field systems. Although the model inspired future research, such as that regarding the "equal-odds baseline," its formal definition of "blindness" was inadequate. Recently, a new definition has been advanced that puts this essential concept on a stronger basis. Rather than relying on ideas drawn from evolutionary theory, the new definition depends on epistemology, which is more consistent with Campbell's original intentions. The result is a typology of rational, irrational, and blind variations, where only the blind are logically associated with creativity and knowledge production.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2024.09.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blind-variation selective-retention
8
combinatorial creativity
4
creativity blind-variation
4
selective-retention definitional
4
definitional update
4
update simonton
4
simonton 2010
4
2010 presented
4
presented combinational
4
combinational model
4

Similar Publications

Combinatorial creativity as blind-variation and selective-retention: A definitional update.

Phys Life Rev

December 2024

Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Electronic address:

Simonton (2010) presented a combinational model of exceptional creativity based on Campbell's (1960) theory of blind-variation and selective-retention (BVSR). The presentation provided an explanatory and predictive basis for comprehending the phenomenon with respect to individual, domain, and field systems. Although the model inspired future research, such as that regarding the "equal-odds baseline," its formal definition of "blindness" was inadequate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

All creative activity brings about change, since it results in the production of something that did not previously exist. The act of creation is itself influenced by changes that have been previously brought about by others, including previous acts of creation. As with any human behavior, creativity has both biological and cultural aspects and is therefore influenced by biological as well as cultural evolution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Intentional cultural change.

Curr Opin Psychol

April 2016

Departments of Biology and Anthropology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902, USA. Electronic address:

As a process of blind variation and selective retention, evolution lacks intentionality. Nevertheless, intentional processes can be a product of evolution and can double back to effect evolution. This article briefly describes how intentional processes evolve, how they figure in human cultural evolution, and how future cultural evolution needs to become more intentional.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Creativity is a vast construct, seemingly intractable to scientific inquiry-perhaps due to the vague concepts applied to the field of research. One attempt to limit the purview of creative cognition formulates the construct in terms of evolutionary constraints, namely that of blind variation and selective retention (BVSR). Behaviorally, one can limit the "blind variation" component to idea generation tests as manifested by measures of divergent thinking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!