Aim /objective: To identify strategies nursing students recommend for responding to discrimination in their program.
Background: The nursing discipline is rooted in social justice, which is increasingly positioned as practices that seek to enhance equity in health and healthcare. Yet, a growing body of knowledge indicates nursing students experience discrimination by virtue of race, sexual identity, gender identity, ability and mental health in nursing programs. There is a dearth of information that speaks to redressing discrimination in nursing schools, particularly from the perspectives of nursing students.
Design: This study reports on the findings of the qualitative portion of a mixed-methods project.
Methods: Data were collected via qualitative interviews (n=20) conducted on the Zoom platform. Inclusion criteria included any nursing graduate or undergraduate student enrolled in two institutions in Western Canada. Analysis was guided by a combination of thematic analysis with interpretive description to facilitate the identification of broader themes within the context of relevant disciplinary considerations.
Results: Three key themes that represent nursing student perspectives to redress discrimination in their programs were identified: (1) strategies to redress discrimination at the level of the educator/curriculum, (2) strategies to redress discrimination at the structural level and, (3) strategies to support students who have experienced discrimination.
Conclusions: Systematic curriculum updates and educator supports to ensure up-to date knowledge and appropriate educator approaches are needed in classroom and clinical settings. The integration of equity-seeking processes at higher levels, e.g. for example, nursing standards of practice, was identified as essential to redress discrimination in education as well in everyday nursing practice. Lastly, a clearly defined reporting pathway was suggested to support students who have been subject to discrimination. Given this is one of the first investigations into student perspectives on redressing discrimination in nursing schools, additional research is needed to evoke meaningful change.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104134 | DOI Listing |
Soc Sci Med
January 2025
Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
There has been a recent influx in the development of novel measures of structural forms of discrimination, including structural racism, xenophobia, sexism, heterosexism, and cisgenderism. These systems of power and oppression are inherently interdependent and mutually constitutive, yet a paucity of research has investigated their joint impacts; this gap is likely reflective of the limited guidance that exists regarding how to effectively combine multiple measures of structural discrimination to examine their joint impacts on population health and health inequities. In this commentary, we seek to redress this by describing conceptual and methodologic considerations for population health researchers interested in conducting quantitative structural intersectionality research - an intersectionality-informed research approach focused on examining how systems of power and oppression intersect to shape population health and health inequities.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Adv Nurs
January 2025
School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Aim: This research aimed to explore nursing students' experiences and perspectives on discrimination within nursing programs across classroom and clinical contexts, as well as structural discrimination through institutional policies and processes.
Design: Convergent mixed methods.
Methods: Survey and individual interviews to capture students' experiences and perspectives on discrimination within nursing programs.
Can J Nurs Res
October 2024
Research Associate, BC IHNR Chair, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Study Background: The experience of discrimination through stereotyping, profiling, and bias-informed care not only leads to poor access to healthcare services, but low retention rates of Indigenous health professionals (IHP). As health systems transformation evolves, a significant gap remains in supporting IHP to safely address racism, to be supported culturally to bring their authentic selves and voices to work, and to attend to one's own intellectual, physical, relational, cultural and spiritual wellness within a westernized model of care.
Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the experiences of IHP working in mainstream healthcare in order to understand how their work environment impacts the delivery of cultural safe practices.
Public Health Pract (Oxf)
December 2024
Commissioning, City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council, UK.
Objective: To rapidly identify and summarise evidence on key factors that affect access to support for minoritised informal adult carers which could be addressed at the level of local government policy-making.
Study Design: Rapid evidence review.
Methods: A rapid umbrella review was undertaken of systematic reviews of qualitative, quantitative and/or mixed method studies.
Nurse Educ Pract
October 2024
School of Nursing, Camosun College, 4461 Interurban Rd, Victoria, BC V9E 2C1, Canada. Electronic address:
Aim /objective: To identify strategies nursing students recommend for responding to discrimination in their program.
Background: The nursing discipline is rooted in social justice, which is increasingly positioned as practices that seek to enhance equity in health and healthcare. Yet, a growing body of knowledge indicates nursing students experience discrimination by virtue of race, sexual identity, gender identity, ability and mental health in nursing programs.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!