AI Article Synopsis

  • Low-dose computed tomography significantly reduces lung cancer mortality by 20% in high-risk individuals, but the rate of lung cancer screening (LCS) remains low across the U.S.
  • Out of 28,071 eligible participants, only 17.24% underwent screening, with older individuals being more likely to get screened, while females, those without insurance, and individuals lacking primary care were less likely to participate.
  • The study highlights disparities in LCS uptake based on demographics, health access, and state residency, suggesting a need for targeted interventions to improve screening rates among at-risk populations.

Article Abstract

Background: Scanning with low-dose computed tomography reduces lung cancer mortality by 20% among high-risk individuals. Despite its efficacy, the uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS) remains low. Our study aimed to estimate state-level and nationwide LCS rates among eligible individuals and to assess disparities in LCS uptake.

Methods: Data for this study were obtained from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to model the associations between predictors and outcome variables and to examine LCS variability across states.

Results: Of the 28,071 participants eligible for LCS, 17.24% underwent LCS. Participants ages 65 to 79 years were [OR, 1.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.54-1.99] more likely to undergo LCS than their younger counterparts. Those who were female (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.94); divorced, separated, or widowed (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98); without health insurance (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.22-0.53); without a primary care provider (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.19-0.44); and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or those who did not disclose their chronic obstructive pulmonary disease status (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.31-0.40 and OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.73, respectively) were less likely to undergo LCS than their respective counterparts. LCS uptake also varied significantly across U.S. states.

Conclusions: We observed a low uptake of LCS overall and significant variability in LCS uptake by sociodemographic and health-related factors, as well as by state of residence.

Impact: The findings from this study have important implications for community health workers and healthcare clinicians and indicate the need to design effective interventions to increase LCS uptake, targeting specific subgroups of populations and particular U.S. states. See related In the Spotlight, p. 9.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0725DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung cancer
12
lcs
12
lcs uptake
12
cancer screening
8
lcs variability
8
undergo lcs
8
chronic obstructive
8
obstructive pulmonary
8
pulmonary disease
8
95%
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!