A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Influence of different cutting instruments and rotational speeds on heat generation and cutting efficiency when sectioning different types of zirconia. | LitMetric

Influence of different cutting instruments and rotational speeds on heat generation and cutting efficiency when sectioning different types of zirconia.

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater

Department of Prosthodontics, Propaedeutics and Dental, Materials, School of Dentistry, Christian-Albrechts University, Arnold-Heller-Strasse 3, House B, 24105, Kiel, Germany.

Published: December 2024

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the temperature generated on the intaglio surface and efficiency when cutting different types of zirconia with different rotary instruments and rotational speeds.

Methods: A conventional diamond rotary instrument (Brasseler, grit size 107 μm) and special diamond rotary instrument marketed to cut zirconia (4 ZR, Brasseler, grit size 126 μm) were tested on 3Y-TZP and 4Y-TZP zirconia with a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm and 200,000 rpm. Zirconia specimens were cut under water cooling (110 mL/min) in a custom-made holder attached to a universal testing machine. The temperature was recorded with infrared sensors pointing at the intaglio surface of the zirconia specimens.

Results: A rotation speed of 200,000 rpm resulted in significantly shorter cutting times, but also in significantly higher temperatures at the intaglio surface of the zirconia specimens compared with a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm. Significantly shorter cutting times were observed for the conventional diamond rotary instrument than for the special rotary instrument marketed to cut zirconia. Using the special rotary instrument, significantly longer cutting times were recorded for 3Y-TZP than for 4Y-TZP.

Conclusions: A conventional diamond rotary instrument was more efficient than a special rotary instrument. However, to avoid high temperatures when cutting zirconia clinically, a rotation speed of 100,000 rpm is recommended.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106715DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rotary instrument
28
diamond rotary
16
rotation speed
16
intaglio surface
12
conventional diamond
12
speed 100000 rpm
12
cutting times
12
special rotary
12
zirconia
9
instruments rotational
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!