Decompressive nerve surgery associated with low diabetic foot ulcer rate and high-risk bias: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) occurs in 50% of diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. Up to 70% of DM patients incur diabetic foot ulcer(s) (DFU). Of those with DSPN, 20% develop DFU and medical therapy remains challenging. Decompression nerve surgery (DNS) purportedly improves DSPN and DFU. Currently, there is no accurate, pooled DFU incidence post-DNS. Thus, this systematic review meta-analyses DFU incidence post-DNS. Given the 60% global DFU incidence, we hypothesised a lower, pooled DFU incidence following DNS.

Methods: Two authors searched six databases (MEDLINE/PubMed/Web of Science/Embase/Scopus/Cochrane/Google Scholar) to July 2023 for DNS clinical studies. Primary tracked outcomes were new and recurrent DFU incidence post-DNS. Inclusion criteria: clinical studies, adult DM patients, DNS of tibial nerve(s) at minimum, three-month minimum follow-up, and reported new/recurrent DFU incidence post-DNS. Exclusion criteria: non-clinical, non-human studies. GRADE and MINORS instrument(s) evaluated evidence. With random-effects model, DFU incidence was meta-analysed.

Results: For inclusion, 1074 studies were identified and 208 screened. Thirteen studies yielded 2466 and 540 new and recurrent patients with DFU incidence(s) of 1% and 5%, respectively. Primary studies had low-level evidence and high-risk bias, including selection bias using Cochrane Collaboration Bias Risk Tool. A sub-analysis of sample size (new:0% and recurrent:2%) and follow-up length (new:1% and recurrent:7%) produced similar results. Additional analyses based on further co-variables was precluded because of incomplete primary study data.

Conclusions: Overall, despite low DFU incidence post-DNS, clinical studies provide too low-level evidence and high-risk bias for any recommendations. Future randomized, control trials may validate DNS for DFU management.