AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared the effectiveness of two treatments for periodontal-endodontic combined lesions (PECLs): root canal therapy (RCT) alone versus RCT combined with periodontal non-surgical treatment (PNST).
  • Patients who received the combined treatment showed significantly better results, with higher overall effectiveness (90.57% vs. 74.00%), lower inflammation markers, and a reduced incidence of adverse reactions compared to the control group.
  • Key factors affecting treatment outcomes included history of alcoholism and betel nut chewing, which were linked to poorer prognoses for PECL patients.

Article Abstract

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and inflammatory responses of treating periodontal-endodontic combined lesions (PECLs) with root canal therapy (RCT) alone versus RCT combined with periodontal non-surgical treatment (PNST).

Methods: A total of 103 patients with PECLs admitted between January 2019 and January 2020 to Shenzhen Baoan Women's and Children's Hospital were divided into control (RCT alone, 50 cases) and combined (RCT + PNST, 53 cases) groups. Comparative analyses included efficacy assessment, probing depth (PD), bleeding index (BI), plaque index (PLI), gingival index (GI), serum levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), pain severity during RCT, incidence of adverse reactions, post-treatment tooth conditions, and recurrence rates at 6 and 12 months. Univariate analysis identified factors associated with poor treatment outcome in PECL patients.

Results: The combined group demonstrated a higher total effective rate (90.57%) compared to the control group (74.00%) (P < 0.05). Patients receiving combined therapy showed significantly lower PD, BI, PLI, GI, IL-1β, TNF-α, and hs-CRP levels, as well as reduced pain severity and lower recurrence rates at 6 and 12 months (all P < 0.05). The combined group also had a lower incidence of adverse (periodontal distending pain and local foreign body sensation) reactions (7.54%) compared to the control group (26.00%) (P < 0.05). After treatment, the incidence of periodontitis, percussion tenderness, and loosening of teeth in the combined group was lower than that of the control group, and the retention rate of affected teeth was significantly higher (all P < 0.05). Factors such as history of alcoholism, betel nut chewing, and treatment method (RCT) were significantly associated with poorer prognosis in PECL patients (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Combined RCT and PNST improves clinical efficacy, reduces pain severity and inflammation levels, decreases adverse reactions, and enhances tooth retention in PECL patients. This treatment approach should be considered the preferred option for managing PECLs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384392PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.62347/QXSM2899DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pain severity
12
combined group
12
control group
12
combined
9
efficacy inflammatory
8
inflammatory responses
8
root canal
8
canal therapy
8
periodontal non-surgical
8
non-surgical treatment
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!