Objective: To develop a comprehensive and evidence-based early rehabilitation framework for critically ill patients, aiming to establish a systematic and scientifically grounded rehabilitation system.
Methods: A Delphi survey study was conducted, involving two rounds of consultations with 24 experts from critical care medicine, nursing, respiratory therapy, and rehabilitation medicine. Based on evidence from the literature, a draft rehabilitation system was created and evaluated using a Likert 5-point scale. Entries were refined based on expert feedback, with criteria for inclusion being a mean score ≥4, a coefficient of variation <0.25, and agreement (percentage of ratings as "very important" or "important" and "very operative" or "strong operability") ≥75%. Entries were modified or deleted according to expert suggestions.
Results: The survey achieved recall rates of 95.8% (23/24) and 86.9% (20/23) in the first and second rounds, respectively. The experts' judgment basis, familiarity, and authority coefficients were 0.96, 0.94, and 0.95, respectively. Following the initial round, 20 questionnaire entries were amended, 14 new entries were added, and 1 was deleted. The second round of Delphi consultations resulted in an early rehabilitation system consisting of 5 primary indicators, 21 secondary indicators, and 56 tertiary indicators, totaling 82 entries.
Conclusions: This study established the first Chinese early rehabilitation system for critically ill patients based on the scientific Delphi method. It provides a structured framework that can serve as a reference for early rehabilitation practices in settings for critically ill patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384373 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.62347/ASAB6587 | DOI Listing |
BMJ Neurol Open
January 2025
The Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Objectives: Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a complex disorder, recently attracting much research into aetiology and treatment. However, there is limited research on the patient's lived experience. This paper addresses this gap to ask: 'What is the subjective life experience of adult patients living with FND?'
Methods: From 1980 to 2020, Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Science Direct, PubMed, CINAHL and Embase were searched for English language qualitative adult research.
Glob Epidemiol
June 2025
Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Brazil.
Unlabelled: COVID-19 is no longer a global health emergency, but it remains challenging to predict its prognosis.
Objective: To develop and validate an instrument to predict COVID-19 progression for critically ill hospitalized patients in a Brazilian population.
Methodology: Observational study with retrospective follow-up.
F1000Res
January 2025
Department of Human Pathology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Nairobi County, Kenya.
Background: Bacterial infections in the Intensive Care Units are a threat to the lives of critically ill patients. Their vulnerable immunity predisposes them to developing bacteria-associated sepsis, deteriorating their already fragile health. In the face of increasing antibiotics resistance, the problem of bacterial infection in ICU is worsening.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntensive Care Med
January 2025
Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Chest
January 2025
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Institut du Savoir Montfort, Hôpital Montfort, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Background: Survivorship after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) critical illness may be associated with important long-term sequelae, but little is known regarding mental health outcomes.
Research Question: What is the association between COVID-19 critical illness and new post-discharge mental health diagnoses.
Study Design: AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada (January 1, 2020-March 31, 2022).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!