Prognostic impact of interstitial lung disease on pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Sci Rep

Division of Chest Surgery, Department of Surgery, Toho University School of Medicine, 6-11-1, Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan.

Published: September 2024

Pulmonary high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (HGNECs) have poor prognoses and require multimodal treatment, and interstitial lung disease (ILD) restricts sufficient treatment of patients with lung cancer. We aimed to clarify ILD's prognostic impact on pulmonary HGNEC, which has previously gone unreported. We retrospectively analyzed 53 patients with HGNEC who underwent resections at our department between 2006 and 2021 and evaluated the clinicopathological prognostic features, including ILD. The patients' mean age was 70 years; 46 (87%) were male, and all were smokers. Large-cell neuroendocrine and small-cell lung carcinomas were diagnosed in 36 (68%) and 17 (32%) patients, respectively. The pathological stages were stage I, II, and III in 31 (58%), 11 (21%), and 11 (21%) patients, respectively. Nine patients (17%) had ILD, which was a significant overall survival prognostic factor in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis (p = 0.048), along with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.004) and non-administration of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.003). The 5 year survival rate of the ILD patients was 0%, significantly worse than that of patients without ILD (58.7%; p = 0.003). Patients with HGNEC and ILD had a poor prognosis owing to adjuvant therapy's limited availability for recurrence and the development of acute exacerbations associated with ILD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390706PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72267-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prognostic impact
8
interstitial lung
8
lung disease
8
pulmonary high-grade
8
high-grade neuroendocrine
8
patients
8
patients hgnec
8
ild
7
prognostic
4
impact interstitial
4

Similar Publications

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, with the worst prognosis among all subtypes. The impact of distinct cell subpopulations within the tumor microenvironment (TME) on TNBC patient prognosis has yet to be clarified.

Methods: Utilizing single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) integrated with bulk RNA sequencing (bulk RNA-seq), we applied Cox regression models to compute hazard ratios, and cross-validated prognostic scoring using a GLMNET-based Cox model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Serum Cystatin S (CST4), a secretory protein that inhibits cellular matrix degradation, significantly influences the tumor microenvironment and tumor progression. However, the prognostic value of serum CST4 in gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. This study aims to explore serum CST4's utility in GC prognostic assessment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Encorafenib plus cetuximab (EC) is the standard of care for pre-treated mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Depth of response (DpR) and early tumour shrinkage (ETS) previously showed a strong correlation with survival outcomes of first-line chemotherapy ± biological agents.

Objectives: We aimed to assess potential predictors of primary resistance to EC ± binimetinib (B) and relationships of DpR/ETS with survival outcomes and clinical characteristics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate whether cumulative impact load and serum biomarkers are related to lower-extremity injury and to determine any impact load and cartilage biomarker relationships in collegiate female basketball athletes.

Methods: This was a prospective longitudinal study evaluating lower-extremity impact load, serum cartilage biomarkers, and injury incidence over the course of a single collegiate women's basketball season. Data were collected from August 2022 to April 2023; no other follow-up after the cessation of the season was conducted in this cohort.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Niraparib was approved for first-line (1L) maintenance (1LM) treatment of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) following the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 (PRIMA) trial. PRIMA was restricted to patients at higher risk of progression (excluded stage III EOC with no visible residual disease [NVRD] after primary cytoreductive surgery [PCS]). This retrospective study evaluated the potential impact of excluding stage III EOC with NVRD from PRIMA by assessing real-world treatment outcomes following 1LM niraparib monotherapy in this patient population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!