Silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings to prevent hospital-acquired sacrum pressure ulcers: An economic evaluation based on a publicly funded pragmatic randomized controlled trial linked with real-world data.

J Tissue Viability

Ghent University, Skin Integrity Research Group (SKINT), University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent, Belgium; Örebro University, Swedish Centre for Skin and Wound Research (SCENTR), School of Health Sciences, Örebro, Sweden.

Published: November 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of using multilayer silicone foam dressings for preventing pressure ulcers in high-risk hospital patients compared to standard prevention methods.
  • - Results from a randomized controlled trial indicate a 41% reduction in the risk of developing new pressure ulcers using these dressings, with a favorable impact on quality of life for patients without ulcers.
  • - The analysis suggests that using silicone foam dressings can be both clinically effective and cost-neutral, supporting their use in similar hospital populations.

Article Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of sacrum multilayer silicone foam dressings as an adjuvant prophylactic therapy compared to standard pressure ulcer prevention in a hospital population at high risk for pressure ulcer development.

Methods: An economic evaluation is performed from a healthcare payer's perspective. This evaluation is based on a Belgian publicly funded pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT), linked with real-world data from administrative claims database and a Belgian cost analysis. A cost-consequences analysis with a one-year time horizon is performed.

Results: The RCT has shown that the risk of developing a new pressure ulcer on the sacrum was statistically significantly reduced by 41 % in the treatment group (RR = 0.59, 95 % CI 0.35-0.98, p = 0.04). The absolute risk reduction of 2.0 % (95 % CI -0.1-4.1 %) coincides with a number needed to treat of 50.0 to prevent one new pressure ulcer of category II or worse. The evolution of quality of life is on average negative for patients who developed a pressure ulcer before day 3, while it is positive for patients without pressure ulcers. In a scenario with conservative assumptions, i.e. without inclusion of price discounts for the multilayer silicone foam dressings and only including costs during the hospitalization, pressure ulcer prevention with dressings on the sacrum was already cost-neutral.

Conclusions: The preventive use of silicone adhesive multilayer foam dressings on the sacrum for a population similar to the pragmatic trial population can be supported both from a clinical and economic point of view.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.08.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pressure ulcer
24
foam dressings
16
silicone adhesive
8
adhesive multilayer
8
multilayer foam
8
pressure
8
pressure ulcers
8
economic evaluation
8
evaluation based
8
publicly funded
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!