This study investigated optimization settings that steepen the dose gradient as a function of target size for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Sixty-eight lung SBRT patients with planning target volumes (PTVs) ranging from 2-203 cc were categorized into small (<20 cc), medium (20-50 cc), and large (>50 cc) groups. VMAT plans were generated using the normal tissue objective (NTO) to penalize the dose gradient at progressively steeper NTO fall-off values (0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 mm). Dose was calculated using the AcurosXB algorithm and was normalized so the prescription dose covered 95% of the PTV. Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA tests were used to assess for statistical differences in the Conformity Index at the 50% isodose level (CI50%), global maximum dose (D), and monitor units (MU) across the various NTO settings. All plans adhered to institutional criteria and met the guidelines of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0813. Steeper NTO fall-off values significantly increased D and MUs across all groups (p < 0.05). CI50% significantly differed with fall-off values in small (0.3 mm) and medium (0.2 mm) targets, indicating steeper NTO fall-off values improve CI50% for small and medium targets (p < 0.05). Large targets showed no significant CI50% difference across these fall-off values. As target size increases, the importance of fall-off values in achieving an acceptable CI50% diminishes. Smaller targets benefit from steeper fall-off values despite increased D and MUs. Consideration of fall-off value relative to target size is crucial to limit dose spillage outside the target.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2024.08.003 | DOI Listing |
Phys Med
January 2025
IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Medical Physics, Milano, Italy.
Purpose: This study analyzed inter-institute conformity and dose gradient variability of CyberKnife (CK) brain SRS/SRT plans. The feasibility of multi-center predictive models was investigated, aiming at guided/automated planning optimization.
Methods: Data from 335 clinical plans, delivered for single lesions in 1-5 fractions, were collected by 8 CK centers.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev
November 2024
School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Purpose: This study evaluated the dose fall off and valley dose percentage in pelvic cancer Lattice Radiotherapy (LRT) using various treatment techniques.
Methods: Forty five treatment plans were developed for 15 patients undergoing radiotherapy using a linear accelerator. Plans were categorized into three sets: RapidArc (RA), seven-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and nine-field IMRT, both for high-dose (HD) vertices and the entire planning target volume (PTV).
Jpn J Radiol
November 2024
Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Chennai Campus, Vandalur - Kelambakkam Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 127, India.
Purpose: To optimize NTO parameters in non-coplanar RapidArc (RA) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for multiple brain metastases and compare them with HyperArc (HA) plans.
Materials And Methods: Thirty patients with multiple brain metastases, receiving 21 Gy prescriptions, were retrospectively enrolled, with lesions ranging from two to eight and volumes between 0.27 and 10.
Cancers (Basel)
October 2024
New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA.
Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Treatment options for localized, early-stage disease include enucleation, brachytherapy, and proton beam therapy. This review aims to evaluate the role of proton therapy in the definitive management of uveal melanoma, focusing on its physics, radiobiology, treatment techniques, and associated outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
September 2024
Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon 630-522, Republic of Korea.
This research aims to evaluate the usability of the HyperArc (HA) technique in stereotactic radiosurgery for cervical spine metastasis by comparing the dosimetry of the target and organs at risk, specifically the spinal cord, between HA and VMAT and conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). A RANDO phantom and QFix Encompass and support system were used to simulate three target types (A, B, and C) based on RTOG0631 guidelines. Treatment plans included one VMAT and two HyperArc techniques with different SRS NTO values (100 and 250).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!