AI Article Synopsis

  • The study reviews the rising trend of performing tricuspid valve repair alongside mitral valve surgery, exploring its impact on the risk of needing a permanent pacemaker post-surgery.
  • A total of 1,060 patients were analyzed, showing an overall permanent pacemaker implantation rate of 4.3%, with no significant difference between those undergoing only mitral valve surgery and those having both mitral and tricuspid surgeries.
  • Ultimately, the findings suggest that adding tricuspid valve surgery does not independently increase the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation after mitral valve surgery.

Article Abstract

Objectives: The threshold to perform concomitant tricuspid valve (TV) repair during primary mitral valve (MV) surgery has decreased, based on recent randomized evidence. Based on these developments, the indication for TV repair during MV surgery is expected to increase further. However, concerns have been raised regarding the risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) during a concomitant procedure. Therefore, we aim to assess the incidence of PPI in combined MV and TV surgery in a nationwide registry.

Methods: The current study uniquely cross-linked the Cardiothoracic and Pacemaker/ICD registry of the Netherlands Heart Registration. Patients undergoing primary MV and TV surgery (± atrial septal defect closure, rhythm surgery, coronary artery bypass grafting) between 1 January and 31 December2021 were included. The primary outcome was PPI within 30 days after surgery. Subgroup analyses were performed for isolated MV and TV surgery and MV repair. The association between concomitant TV surgery and PPI was assessed using multivariable binary logistic regression analyses.

Results: A total of 1060 patients (n = 833 MV, n = 227 MV + TV) were included. The overall incidence of PPI was 4.3%. No significant difference in PPI between MV and MV + TV surgery were found (3.7% vs 6.6%, P = 0.06). Concomitant TV surgery was not an independent risk factor for PPI after surgery after adjustment for covariates. These results were robust after sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: The current study was not able to find a statistical difference between the PPI rate in MV surgery patients and MV + TV surgery patients. Extension of the waiting period prior to PPI, may result in decreased PPI rates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae328DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surgery
14
ppi
10
permanent pacemaker
8
pacemaker implantation
8
tricuspid valve
8
valve surgery
8
surgery nationwide
8
incidence ppi
8
current study
8
concomitant surgery
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!