AI Article Synopsis

  • A study compared compressed sensing (CS) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) to traditional parallel imaging (PI) for enhancing image quality and reducing scan time in female pelvic MRI at 1.5-T.
  • Results showed that CS combined with DLR yielded significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for both T1 and T2-weighted images, indicating improved diagnostic performance.
  • The findings concluded that using CS with DLR is more effective than PI, providing better image quality and shorter examination times for female pelvic MRIs.

Article Abstract

Background: We aimed to determine the capabilities of compressed sensing (CS) and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with those of conventional parallel imaging (PI) for improving image quality while reducing examination time on female pelvic 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods: Fifty-two consecutive female patients with various pelvic diseases underwent MRI with T1- and T2-weighted sequences using CS and PI. All CS data was reconstructed with and without DLR. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of muscle and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between fat tissue and iliac muscle on T1-weighted images (T1WI) and between myometrium and straight muscle on T2-weighted images (T2WI) were determined through region-of-interest measurements. Overall image quality (OIQ) and diagnostic confidence level (DCL) were evaluated on 5-point scales. SNRs and CNRs were compared using Tukey's test, and qualitative indexes using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: SNRs of T1WI and T2WI obtained using CS with DLR were higher than those using CS without DLR or conventional PI (p < 0.010). CNRs of T1WI and T2WI obtained using CS with DLR were higher than those using CS without DLR or conventional PI (p < 0.003). OIQ of T1WI and T2WI obtained using CS with DLR were higher than that using CS without DLR or conventional PI (p < 0.001). DCL of T2WI obtained using CS with DLR was higher than that using conventional PI or CS without DLR (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: CS with DLR provided better image quality and shorter examination time than those obtainable with PI for female pelvic 1.5-T MRI.

Relevance Statement: CS with DLR can be considered effective for attaining better image quality and shorter examination time for female pelvic MRI at 1.5 T compared with those obtainable with PI.

Key Points: Patients underwent MRI with T1- and T2-weighted sequences using CS and PI. All CS data was reconstructed with and without DLR. CS with DLR allowed for examination times significantly shorter than those of PI and provided significantly higher signal- and CNRs, as well as OIQ.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11387279PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00506-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

compressed sensing
8
sensing deep
8
deep learning
8
learning reconstruction
8
female pelvic
8
dlr conventional
8
image quality
8
efficacy compressed
4
reconstruction adult
4
adult female
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!