AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study analyzed 10 years of treatment planning error data collected by medical physicists, focusing on high-risk errors, the impact of treatment volume on error rates, and the effectiveness of an Automated Plan Checking System (APCS).
  • - Findings indicated that using APCS reduced error rates by around 1% for high-risk errors and 3% for low-risk errors, and there was an inverse relationship between the number of treatments and error rates.
  • - The research also revealed that high workloads among medical physicists and a higher number of less experienced physicians were linked to increased error occurrences, emphasizing the need for adequate training and additional plan checkers to mitigate these errors.

Article Abstract

The present study aimed to summarize and report data on errors related to treatment planning, which were collected by medical physicists. The following analyses were performed based on the 10-year error report data: (1) listing of high-risk errors that occurred and (2) the relationship between the number of treatments and error rates, (3) usefulness of the Automated Plan Checking System (APCS) with the Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface and (4) the relationship between human factors and error rates. Differences in error rates were observed before and after the use of APCS. APCS reduced the error rate by ~1% for high-risk errors and 3% for low-risk errors. The number of treatments was negatively correlated with error rates. Therefore, we examined the relationship between the workload of medical physicists and error occurrence and revealed that a very large workload may contribute to overlooking errors. Meanwhile, an increase in the number of medical physicists may lead to the detection of more errors. The number of errors was correlated with the number of physicians with less clinical experience; the error rates were higher when there were more physicians with less experience. This is likely due to the lack of training among clinically inexperienced physicians. An environment to provide adequate training is important, as inexperience in clinical practice can easily and directly lead to the occurrence of errors. In any environment, the need for additional plan checkers is an essential factor for eliminating errors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11420834PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrae053DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

error rates
20
medical physicists
12
errors
10
treatment planning
8
report data
8
error
8
high-risk errors
8
number treatments
8
errors number
8
number
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!