Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
On December 14, 2023, the U.S. FDA approved belzutifan (Welireg, Merck & Co., Inc.) for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following treatment with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and a VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The FDA granted traditional approval based on LITESPARK-005 (NCT04195750), an open-label, randomized, head-to-head trial of 746 patients with advanced RCC that progressed following treatment with both a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and a VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive belzutifan or everolimus. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review and overall survival. A statistically significant improvement in PFS was demonstrated for belzutifan compared with everolimus [HR = 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63-0.90; one-sided P value = 0.0008]. Kaplan-Meier curves reflected nonproportional hazards with similar median PFS estimates of 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.9-7.0) in the belzutifan arm and 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.8-5.8) in the everolimus arm. Although not reaching full maturity, the overall survival results seemed to show a favorable trend in the belzutifan arm compared with the everolimus arm (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.73-1.07). The confirmed objective response rate by blinded independent central review was 22% and 3.6% in the belzutifan and everolimus arms, respectively. Observed toxicities differed between treatment arms, but drug discontinuations and interruptions due to treatment-emergent adverse events were lower in the belzutifan arm compared with the everolimus arm, and a descriptive analysis of patient-reported symptom and functional outcomes was suggestive of favorable tolerability for belzutifan compared with everolimus.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567780 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1199 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!