A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effects of muscle quantity, muscle quality, and phase angle on whole-body reaction time in 5164 adults aged 20-91 years. | LitMetric

Purpose: Muscle quantity, defined as appendicular lean mass (ALM); muscle quality, defined as the ratio of muscle strength to ALM; and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)-derived phase angle (PhA) are determinants of physical performance. We examined whether muscle quality indices were significant predictors of the whole-body reaction time (WBRT) in healthy female and male adults aged 20-91 years.

Methods: Data from 5164 adults (2869 women and 2295 men; mean age ± standard deviation, 60.9 ± 15.6 years) were analyzed. Height and weight were measured, and body mass index was calculated. ALM was estimated using a previously validated 8-electrode multi-frequency BIA. PhA was measured at 50 kHz using a BIA device. Knee extension strength (KES), leg extension power (LEP), and flexibility were examined. The ALM to weight (ALM/weight), KES to ALM (KES/ALM), and LEP to KES (LEP/KES) ratios were calculated. In the WBRT test, participants were asked to stand on a force plate and jump upright as quickly as possible in response to a light stimulus. The WBRT was divided into the response initiation and motion execution phases.

Results: ALM/weight, KES/ALM, LEP/KES, PhA, and flexibility were significant independent predictors of WBRT and the time of the motion execution phase (p < 0.001). However, PhA was not a significant predictor of the time of response initiation phase.

Conclusion: Muscle quantity (ALM/weight), muscle quality (KES/ALM and LEP/KES), PhA, and flexibility are determinants of WBRT test performance, particularly in the motion execution phase.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05591-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

muscle quality
12
muscle quantity
8
phase angle
8
whole-body reaction
8
reaction time
8
5164 adults
8
adults aged
8
motion execution
8
muscle
5
alm
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!