AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to analyze and categorize the circumstances surrounding sudden-onset hamstring injuries in professional football players using video footage from matches.
  • Researchers reviewed injuries from the Qatar Stars League, focusing on players aged 18 and older, and found that running was the most significant factor, accounting for 86% of the injuries.
  • Results revealed that injuries frequently occurred during short sprints (0-10 m) and were often linked to player contact and balance issues, emphasizing the role of pressing actions in a significant percentage of cases.

Article Abstract

Objective: To describe and categorise the injury-inciting circumstances of sudden-onset hamstring match injuries in professional football players using systematic video analysis.

Methods: Using a prospective injury surveillance database, all sudden-onset hamstring match injuries in male football players (18 years and older) from the Qatar Stars League between September 2013 and August 2020 were reviewed and cross-referenced with broadcasted match footage. Videos with a clear observable painful event (ie, a player grabbing their posterior thigh) were included. Nine investigators independently analysed all videos to describe and categorise injury-inciting circumstances. We used three main categories: playing situation (eg, time of injury), player action(s) (eg, running) and other considerations (eg, contact). Player action(s) and other considerations were not mutually exclusive.

Results: We included 63 sudden-onset hamstring match injuries out of 295 registered injuries between 2013 and 2020. Running was involved in 86% of injuries. Hamstring injuries occurred primarily during acceleration of 0-10 m (24% of all injuries) and in general at different running distances (0-50 m) and speeds (slow to fast). At 0-10 m distance, indirect player-to-player contact and inadequate balance were involved in 53% and 67% of the cases, respectively. Pressing occurred in 46% of all injuries (injured player pressing opponent: 25%; being pressed by opponent: 21%) and frequently involved player-to-player contact (69% of the cases when the injured player was pressing vs 15% of the cases when the opponent was pressing) and inadequate balance (82% vs 50%, respectively). Other player actions that did not involve running (n=9, 14% of all injuries) were kicking (n=6) and jumping (n=3).

Conclusion: The injury-inciting circumstances of sudden-onset hamstring match injuries in football varied. The most common single-player action (24%) was acceleration over a distance of <10 m. Pressing, inadequate balance and indirect contact were frequently seen player actions. Injury prevention research in football should look beyond high-speed running as the leading risk factor for sudden-onset hamstring injuries.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2023-106722DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sudden-onset hamstring
20
match injuries
20
injury-inciting circumstances
16
hamstring match
16
circumstances sudden-onset
12
injuries
12
football players
12
player actions
12
hamstring injuries
8
injuries male
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!