AI Article Synopsis

  • This study compares outcomes of radical nephrectomy (RN) versus partial nephrectomy (PN) for treating sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) using a large national database from 2004 to 2019.
  • The analysis found that patients receiving PN had better overall survival rates, particularly in early-stage tumors (cT1 and cT3), although factors like age and tumor characteristics influenced the likelihood of receiving PN.
  • The results suggest that PN can be a viable option for certain patients without compromising outcomes, but disparities in care exist based on income and insurance status, affecting survival rates.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To compare outcomes of radical (RN) and partial nephrectomy (PN) in Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma (sRCC) utilizing a large national cohort. As RN is the reference standard for localized RCC with clinically aggressive features, PN in sRCC has been seldom studied.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2019 for patients who underwent PN and RN for sRCC (T1-T3N0-N1M0). We performed multivariable analyses (MVA) to determine factors associated with PN and all-cause mortality (ACM), and Kaplan-Meier Analysis (KMA) for overall survival (OS) in Charlson 0 patients who underwent PN vs. RN according to clinical stage.

Results: The cohort consisted of 5,265 patients [RN 4,582 (87.0%)/PN 683 (13.0%)]. Increased odds of receiving PN was associated with papillary RCC (OR = 1.69, p = 0.015); inversely with increasing age (OR = 0.99, p = 0.004), cT2-cT3 (OR = 0.23, p < 0.001), and cN1 (OR = 0.2, p < 0.001). Worsened ACM was associated with positive margins (HR = 1.59, p < 0.001), male (HR = 1.1, p = 0.044), Charlson [Formula: see text]2 (HR = 1.47, p < 0.001), cT2-cT3 (HR 1.17-1.39, p < 0.001-0.035), and cN1 (HR = 1.59, p < 0.001). Improved ACM was noted with PN (HR = 0.64, p < 0.001), increasing household income (HR = 0.77-0.79, p < 0.001), and private insurance (HR = 0.80, p = 0.018). KMA showed PN had improved 5-year OS compared to RN in cT1 (86.5% vs. 63.2%, p < 0.001), and cT3 (61.0% vs. 44.0% p < 0.001), but not cT2 (p = 0.67).

Conclusion: In select patients, PN with negative margins may not compromise outcomes and may provide benefit when indicated. Patients with private insurance and highest income experienced improved survival suggesting disparity in care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05169-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

outcomes radical
8
radical partial
8
partial nephrectomy
8
nephrectomy sarcomatoid
8
sarcomatoid renal
8
renal cell
8
cell carcinoma
8
analysis national
8
national cancer
8
cancer database
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!